Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367576›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Cancer type prediction based on copy number aberration and chromatin 3D structure with convolutional neural networks.

Yuchen Yuan, Yi Shi, Xianbin Su, Xin Zou, Qing Luo, David Dagan Feng, Weidong Cai, Ze-Guang Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Based on 3D Genome Selected circRNA.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuchen YuanKey Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Yi ShiKey Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. yishi@sjtu.edu.cn.
Xianbin SuKey Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Xin ZouKey Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Qing LuoKey Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
David Dagan FengSchool of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. dagan.feng@sydney.edu.au.
Weidong CaiSchool of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. tom.cai@sydney.edu.au.
Ze-Guang HanKey Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. hanzg@sjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the developments of DNA sequencing technology, large amounts of sequencing data have been produced that provides unprecedented opportunities for advanced association studies between somatic mutations and cancer types/subtypes which further contributes to more accurate somatic mutation based cancer typing (SMCT). In existing SMCT methods however, the absence of high-level feature extraction is a major obstacle in improving the classification performance.

resultsWe propose DeepCNA, an advanced convolutional neural network (CNN) based classifier, which utilizes copy number aberrations (CNAs) and HiC data, to address this issue. DeepCNA first pre-process the CNA data by clipping, zero padding and reshaping. Then, the processed data is fed into a CNN classifier, which extracts high-level features for accurate classification. Experimental results on the COSMIC CNA dataset indicate that 2D CNN with both cell lines of HiC data lead to the best performance. We further compare DeepCNA with three widely adopted classifiers, and demonstrate that DeepCNA has at least 78% improvement of performance.

conclusionsThis paper demonstrates the advantages and potential of the proposed DeepCNA model for processing of somatic point mutation based gene data, and proposes that its usage may be extended to other complex genotype-phenotype association studies.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsNeural Networks, ComputerCell LineChromatinHumansNeoplasmsChromatinCancer type predictionConvolutional neural networkCopy number aberrationDeep learningHiCSomatic mutation

Identifiers

PMID30367576
PMCPMC6101087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.