Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367571›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

An infrastructure for precision medicine through analysis of big data.

Marco Moscatelli, Andrea Manconi, Mauro Pessina, Giovanni Fellegara, Stefano Rampoldi, Luciano Milanesi, Andrea Casasco, Matteo Gnocchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Artificial intelligence and computational pathology.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marco MoscatelliInstitute for Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council (CNR-ITB), via F.lli Cervi 93, Segrate, 20090, MI, Italy. marco.moscatelli@itb.cnr.it.
Andrea ManconiInstitute for Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council (CNR-ITB), via F.lli Cervi 93, Segrate, 20090, MI, Italy.
Mauro PessinaCentro Diagnostico Italiano, Via Simone Saint Bon 20, Milan, 20147, Italy.
Giovanni FellegaraCentro Diagnostico Italiano, Via Simone Saint Bon 20, Milan, 20147, Italy.
Stefano RampoldiCentro Diagnostico Italiano, Via Simone Saint Bon 20, Milan, 20147, Italy.
Luciano MilanesiInstitute for Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council (CNR-ITB), via F.lli Cervi 93, Segrate, 20090, MI, Italy.
Andrea CasascoCentro Diagnostico Italiano, Via Simone Saint Bon 20, Milan, 20147, Italy.
Matteo GnocchiInstitute for Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council (CNR-ITB), via F.lli Cervi 93, Segrate, 20090, MI, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNowadays, the increasing availability of omics data, due to both the advancements in the acquisition of molecular biology results and in systems biology simulation technologies, provides the bases for precision medicine. Success in precision medicine depends on the access to healthcare and biomedical data. To this end, the digitization of all clinical exams and medical records is becoming a standard in hospitals. The digitization is essential to collect, share, and aggregate large volumes of heterogeneous data to support the discovery of hidden patterns with the aim to define predictive models for biomedical purposes. Patients' data sharing is a critical process. In fact, it raises ethical, social, legal, and technological issues that must be properly addressed.

resultsIn this work, we present an infrastructure devised to deal with the integration of large volumes of heterogeneous biological data. The infrastructure was applied to the data collected between 2010-2016 in one of the major diagnostic analysis laboratories in Italy. Data from three different platforms were collected (i.e., laboratory exams, pathological anatomy exams, biopsy exams). The infrastructure has been designed to allow the extraction and aggregation of both unstructured and semi-structured data. Data are properly treated to ensure data security and privacy. Specialized algorithms have also been implemented to process the aggregated information with the aim to obtain a precise historical analysis of the clinical activities of one or more patients. Moreover, three Bayesian classifiers have been developed to analyze examinations reported as free text. Experimental results show that the classifiers exhibit a good accuracy when used to analyze sentences related to the sample location, diseases presence and status of the illnesses.

conclusionsThe infrastructure allows the integration of multiple and heterogeneous sources of anonymized data from the different clinical platforms. Both unstructured and semi-structured data are processed to obtain a precise historical analysis of the clinical activities of one or more patients. Data aggregation allows to perform a series of statistical assessments required to answer complex questions that can be used in a variety of fields, such as predictive and precision medicine. In particular, studying the clinical history of patients that have developed similar pathologies can help to predict or individuate markers able to allow an early diagnosis of possible illnesses.

Indexed as

Big DataData AnalysisPrecision MedicineAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBiopsyComputer SimulationHumansMachine LearningBig dataClinical decision support systemsMachine learningMedical recordNoSQL

Identifiers

PMID30367571
PMCPMC6191972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.