Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367386›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2019

Validation of a matrix reasoning task for mobile devices.

Anja Pahor, Trevor Stavropoulos, Susanne M Jaeggi, Aaron R Seitz

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04344028 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Potential for Placebo Effects in Cognitive Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2020 to 2022Enrolled287ConditionsCognitive ChangeArmsTrue Cognitive Training Program, Control Cognitive Training Program, Positive Expectation Induction, Negative Expectation Induction
NCT05396586 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Assessment and Training of Cognitive Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNortheastern UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled313ConditionsCognitive ChangeArmsN-back, Span, Multisensory
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. PLFest: A New Platform for Accessible, Reproducible, and Open Perceptual Learning Research.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Expectation effects in working memory training.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Divergent Research Methods Limit Understanding of Working Memory Training.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anja PahorUniversity of California, Riverside, CA, USA. anjap@ucr.edu.
Trevor StavropoulosUniversity of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Susanne M JaeggiUniversity of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Aaron R SeitzUniversity of California, Riverside, CA, USA.

Funding

Understanding Mediating and Moderating Factors that Determine Transfer of Working Memory TrainingR01MH111742 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI Susanne M Jaeggi, Aaron R Seitz · 2016 to 2026
$5.1M
Cognitive Training and Brain Plasticity - Towards an Understanding of Mediators and ModeratorsK02AG054665 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JAEGGI, SUSANNE M · 2017 to 2021
$806k
NIA NIH HHS K02 AG054665NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cognitive tasks have been adapted for tablet-based testing, but tests to assess nonverbal reasoning ability, as measured by matrix-type problems that are suited to repeated testing, have yet to be adapted for and validated on mobile platforms. Drawing on previous research, we developed the University of California Matrix Reasoning Task (UCMRT)-a short, user-friendly measure of abstract problem solving with three alternate forms that works on tablets and other mobile devices and that is targeted at a high-ability population frequently used in the literature (i.e., college students). To test the psychometric properties of UCMRT, a large sample of healthy young adults completed parallel forms of the test, and a subsample also completed Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices and a math test; furthermore, we collected college records of academic ability and achievement. These data show that UCMRT is reliable and has adequate convergent and external validity. UCMRT is self-administrable, freely available for researchers, facilitates repeated testing of fluid intelligence, and resolves numerous limitations of existing matrix tests.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneAdolescentFemaleHumansIntelligenceIntelligence TestsMaleProblem SolvingPsychometricsYoung AdultFluid intelligenceMatrix problemsMobileReasoningUCMRTValidity

Identifiers

PMID30367386
PMCPMC6486467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.