ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Comparison of two dipyridamole infusion protocols for myocardial perfusion imaging in subjects with low likelihood of significant obstructive coronary artery disease.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a single ultra processed meal on myocardial endothelial function, adenosine mediated effects and cognitive performances.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Topical Application of Dipyridamole and Roflumilast Combination Nanoparticles Loaded Nanoemulgel for the Treatment of Psoriasis in Rats.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- The potential of regional myocardial blood flow measurement with SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Dipyridamole infusion protocols for absolute myocardial blood flow quantitation by PET.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with positron emission tomography allows accurate measurements of myocardial blood flow (MBF). Stress MBF thresholds have been proposed to provide diagnostic and prognostic information in different pathology. Most studies relying on dipyridamole use a 5-minute infusion protocol, while current guidelines recommend a 4-minute infusion. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different dipyridamole infusion times on stress MBF.
methodsThe charts of 2,207 patients who underwent rubidium-82 MPI were retrospectively reviewed and 147 subjects with low likelihood of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) defined as calcium score = 0, body mass index < 45 kg·m
resultsStress MBF (3.23±0.76 vs 3.02±0.71 mL·min
conclusionsThe 4-minute and 5-minute dipyridamole infusion protocols produce comparable myocardial flow response, hemodynamic changes, and symptoms, in subjects with low likelihood of significant obstructive CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.