Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367355›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2019

Bioresorbable Scaffold-Based Controlled Drug Delivery for Restenosis.

Belay Tesfamariam

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bioprinting for combating infectious diseases.Bioprinting (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Belay TesfamariamDivision of Cardiovascular and Renal Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg 22, Rm 4176, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA. belay.tesfamariam@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-9414-5523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioresorbable scaffolds have emerged as a potential alternative to non-erodible metal implants to alleviate the long-term risk of permanent device vascular implant-related adverse events. Bioresorbable scaffolds provide a temporary mechanical support function until the vessel reaches complete healing, and the implant progressively disappears and vasomotion resumes. A polymer matrix with embedded drugs coated onto the scaffold surface degrades slowly, reducing the size from the exterior toward the interior, and this allows controlled drug release to a local vascular segment. Drug elution from a bioresorbable scaffold system is characterized by a rapid initial release that achieves high concentration along the intimal surface, which is designed to prevail vascular dilation-induced injury and formation of neointimal hyperplasia. This review highlights diverse types of bioresorbable biomaterials as vascular scaffolds, drug release kinetics, adaptive arterial wall remodeling, and complexities in the advancement of vascular scaffolds to treat restenosis.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleAnimalsCardiovascular AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug LiberationEndovascular ProceduresHumansHyperplasiaKineticsNeointimaProsthesis DesignRecurrenceRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeVascular DiseasesCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDelayed-Action PreparationsBiocorrodible metallic scaffoldsBioresorbable polymer scaffoldsDrug distributionDrug release kineticsRestenosisVascular remodeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.