Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367351›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2019

Of cricket chirps and car horns: The effect of nature sounds on cognitive performance.

Stephen C Van Hedger, Howard C Nusbaum, Luke Clohisy, Susanne M Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, Marc G Berman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Walking Green: Developing an Evidence Base for Nature Prescriptions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Homo sapiens, industrialisation and the environmental mismatch hypothesis.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Study on the Soundscape of Underground Commercial Space in Lu'an City and Hefei City, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Effects of Acoustic Environment Types on Stress Relief in Urban Parks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Understanding the Role of Nature Engagement in Supporting Health and Wellbeing during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen C Van HedgerDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. svanhedg@uwo.ca.
Howard C NusbaumDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Luke ClohisyDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Susanne M JaeggiSchool of Education, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Martin BuschkuehlMIND Research Institute, Irvine, CA, USA.
Marc G BermanDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USMIND Research Institute · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences BCS-1632445John Templeton Foundation 58345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention restoration theory (ART) posits that stimuli found in nature may restore directed attention functioning by reducing demands on the endogenous attention system. In the present experiment, we assessed whether nature-related cognitive benefits extended to auditory presentations of nature, a topic that has been understudied. To assess directed attention, we created a composite measure consisting of a backward digit span task and a dual n-back task. Participants completed these cognitive measures and an affective questionnaire before and after listening to and aesthetically judging either natural or urban soundscapes (between-participants). Relative to participants who were exposed to urban soundscapes, we observed significant improvements in cognitive performance for individuals exposed to nature. Urban soundscapes did not systematically affect performance either adversely or beneficially. Natural sounds did not differentially change positive or negative affect, despite these sounds being aesthetically preferred to urban sounds. These results provide initial evidence that brief experiences with natural sounds can improve directed attention functioning in a single experimental session.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionCognitionNaturePattern Recognition, VisualSoundUrbanizationAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAnimalsFemaleGryllidaeHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermAttentionAttention restoration theoryCognitive and attentional controlNature

Identifiers

PMID30367351
OpenAlexW2786791900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.