ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics-based differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses on contrast-enhanced mammography: a reproducible workflow using open-source tools.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- The top 100 most-cited articles on artificial intelligence in breast radiology: a bibliometric analysis.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Detection and Segmentation of Radiolucent Lesions in the Lower Jaw on Panoramic Radiographs Using Deep Neural Networks.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Detection and classification of breast lesions using multiple information on contrast-enhanced mammography by a multiprocess deep-learning system: A multicenter study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- AI-Based Cancer Detection Model for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deep learning-enabled fully automated pipeline system for segmentation and classification of single-mass breast lesions using contrast-enhanced mammography: a prospective, multicentre study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Radiomic analysis in contrast-enhanced mammography using a multivendor data set: accuracy of models according to segmentation techniques.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Predicting Malignancy of Breast Imaging Findings Using Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Attention-based deep learning for breast lesions classification on contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a multicentre study.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Medical Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Contextual Features and Information Bottleneck-Based Multi-Input Network for Breast Cancer Classification from Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours.European radiology · 2022Article
- Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review.BMC medical imaging · 2022Review
- Incorporating the clinical and radiomics features of contrast-enhanced mammography to classify breast lesions: a retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Reinforcement Learning for Precision Oncology.Cancers · 2021Review
- Multiview multimodal network for breast cancer diagnosis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- Radiomic Feature Reduction Approach to Predict Breast Cancer by Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography without and with a delayed image for diagnosing malignancy among mass lesions in dense breast.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2021Article
- CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Fully Automated Support System for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Images.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeContrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a recently developed breast imaging technique. CESM relies on dual-energy acquisition following contrast agent injection to improve mammography sensitivity. CESM is comparable to contrast-enhanced MRI in terms of sensitivity, at a fraction of the cost. However, since lesion variability is large, even with the improved visibility provided by CESM, differentiation between benign and malignant enhancement is not accurate and a biopsy is usually performed for final assessment. Breast biopsies can be stressful to the patient and are expensive to healthcare systems. Moreover, as the biopsies results are most of the time benign, a specificity improvement in the radiologist diagnosis is required. This work presents a deep learning-based decision support system, which aims at improving the specificity of breast cancer diagnosis by CESM without affecting sensitivity.
methodsWe compare two analysis approaches, fine-tuning a pretrained network and fully training a convolutional neural network, for classification of CESM breast mass as benign or malignant. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BIRADS) is a radiological lexicon, used with breast images, to categorize lesions. We improve each classification network by incorporating BIRADS textual features as an additional input to the network. We evaluate two ways of BIRADS fusion as network input: feature fusion and decision fusion. This leads to multimodal network architectures. At classification, we also exploit information from apparently normal breast tissue in the CESM of the considered patient, leading to a patient-specific classification.
resultsWe evaluate performance using fivefold cross-validation, on 129 randomly selected breast lesions annotated by an experienced radiologist. Each annotation includes a contour of the mass in the image, biopsy-proven label of benign or malignant lesion and BIRADS descriptors. At 100% sensitivity, specificity of 66% was achieved using a multimodal network, which combines inputs at feature level and patient-specific classification.
conclusionsThe presented multimodal network may significantly reduce benign biopsies, without compromising sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.