ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2018
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Athletes: Differentiating Physiology From Pathology.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory mechanisms of exercise-induced physiological cardiac hypertrophy: progress and prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- The Effect of Training Experience on Cardiac Morphology in Resistance Exercise Practitioners: A Study on Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Parameters and Left Atrium Mechanical Functions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Exercise Effects on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Concentric and Eccentric Remodelling of the Left Ventricle and Its Association to Function in the Male Athletes Heart: An Exploratory Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Premature Death in Bodybuilders: What Do We Know?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Athlete's Heart: A Cardiovascular Step-By-Step Multimodality Approach.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- The Relationship between the Frontal QRS-T Angle on ECG and Physical Activity Level in Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Clinical Data, Chest Radiograph and Electrocardiography in the Screening for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The CARJournal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Intra-subject stability of different expressions of spatial QRS-T angle and their relationship to heart rate.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Advanced cardiac imaging in athlete's heart: unravelling the grey zone between physiologic adaptation and pathology.La Radiologia medica · 2021Review
- The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Athlete's Heart Diagnosis: Current Status and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- [Assessment of heart's changes of elite Chinese male weightlifter by speckle tracking echocardiography].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021Article
- Coronavirus Disease 2019: Cardiac Complications and Considerations for Returning to Sports Participation.European cardiology · 2021Review
- Advanced Evolution of Pathogenesis Concepts in Cardiomyopathies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe changes that occur in athlete's heart are influenced by a number of factors including age, gender, ethnicity and the type of cardiovascular training. It is therefore important that the clinician is able to integrate all of these factors when assessing athletes to be able to guide investigations appropriately and to distinguish pathology from physiology. This review discusses the potential diagnostic conundrums when trying to differentiate physiological left ventricular hypertrophy from pathological hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in athletes. The mechanism of physiological and pathological hypertrophy is discussed together with history, clinical and investigational findings that can help to identify pathology. RECENT
findingsAthletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are more likely to have non-concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), an elevated relative wall thickness, lateral ECG changes and a smaller LV cavity than athletes with physiological LVH. Certain diastolic echocardiographic parameters when used as part of an algorithm (e'; E/E'; E/A) can help to distinguish physiology from pathology, and there is evidence that assessment of global longitudinal strain during exercise echocardiography may be of use in the future. Cardiac MRI is an important imaging modality that can have an additive effect over echocardiography in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. Late gadolinium enhancement is a recognised advantage for cardiac magnetic resonance to allow detection of fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification may be a tool for the future to help distinguish athlete's heart from HCM. Cardiac adaptation to exercise and training in athletes, the athlete's heart causes electrophysiological and geometric changes that may mimic mild phenotypes of a pathological cardiomyopathy. This review article summarises a systematic approach to the assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes and describes pertinent clinical and investigation findings that can help to differentiate physiology from pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.