Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367233›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019

[Boston type I keratoprosthesis implantation technique : Video article].

M Matthaei, B Bachmann, D Hos, S Siebelmann, F Schaub, C Cursiefen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of keratoprosthesis implantation on retinal and visual pathway function assessed by electrophysiological testing.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  2. [Treatment of vascularized high-risk eyes with a Boston keratoprosthesis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M MatthaeiZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland. mario.matthaei@uk-koeln.de.
B BachmannZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
D HosZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
S SiebelmannZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
F SchaubZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
C CursiefenZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKeratoprosthetics refer to the replacement of human corneal tissue with an artificially produced exchange product. The most widely implanted keratoprosthesis worldwide is the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis (BI-KPro, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA).

methodsThis video article demonstrates the surgical technique of BI-KPro implantation as routinely performed at this institution. In addition, an overview of the surgical indications, patient consent, anesthesia and positioning, postoperative treatment and complications as well as the evidence of the technique is provided in the article based on experience with 31 BI-KPro implantations.

resultsThe indications for BI-KPro primarily include patients in a high-risk keratoplasty setting particularly after repeatedly failed keratoplasty. A thorough patient examination and assessment of the indications as well as detailed disclosure of information to the patient about the individual prognosis, the risk profile, the postoperative therapy and follow-up enable a positive postoperative result.

conclusionThe BI-KPro provides an established and relatively standardized option for surgical treatment of eyes in a high-risk keratoplasty setting. Patients should be preoperatively informed with respect to the individual prognosis, complication profile and life-long follow-up.

Indexed as

Artificial OrgansCorneal DiseasesCorneaHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis ImplantationRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityAftercareComplicationsCorneal tissuePrognosisSurgical procedure

Identifiers

PMID30367233
OpenAlexW2898093225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.