ArticleJournal of medical ethics2019
Too much medicine: not enough trust?
Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: what is known about its communication, and what are the associated ethical issues?Family practice · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Trauma inquiry and response in sexual and reproductive health settings: collaborative learning among clinicians.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Decreasing Preoperative Anxiety in Patients with Newly Available Multimodal Approaches-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Navigating fragmented services: a gender-based violence (GBV) critical feminist analysis of women's experiences engaging with health and social supports in three Canadian cities.BMC public health · 2025Article
- An "ethics of strangers"? On knowing the patient in clinical ethics.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2024Article
- Self-management Support for Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Indicators of the dimensions of trust (and mistrust) in early primary care practice: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Overtreatment in elderly care: ethical considerations.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Article
- Why Do Patients Seek Diagnose Dis-accordance With Hierarchical Medical System Related Policies in Tertiary Hospitals? A Qualitative Study in Shanghai From the Perspective of Physicians.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Custodians of Information: Patient and Physician Views on Sharing Medical Records in the Acute Care Setting.Health communication · 2021Article
- "A Question of Trust" and "a Leap of Faith"-Study Participants' Perspectives on Consent, Privacy, and Trust in Smart Home Research: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- Building trust in American hospital-community development projects: a scoping review.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2021Article
- Using Mistrust, Distrust, and Low Trust Precisely in Medical Care and Medical Research Advances Health Equity.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- Communication training and the prescribing pattern of antibiotic prescription in primary health care.PloS one · 2020Article
- Precision Medicine Approaches to Health Disparities Research.Ethnicity & disease · 2020Article
- Motivation for Healing in Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As many studies around the theme of 'too much medicine' attest, investigations are being ordered with increasing frequency; similarly the threshold for providing treatment has lowered. Our contention is that trust (or lack of it) is a significant factor in influencing this, and that understanding the relationship between trust and investigations and treatments will help clinicians and policymakers ensure ethical decisions are more consistently made. Drawing on the philosophical literature, we investigate the nature of trust in the patient-doctor relationship, arguing that at its core it involves a transfer of discretion. We show that there is substantial empirical support for the idea that more trust will reduce the problem of too much medicine. We then investigate ways in which trust can be built, concentrating on issues of questioning, of acknowledging uncertainty and of shouldering responsibility for it. We argue that offering investigations or treatments as a way of generating trust may itself be an untrustworthy way of proceeding, and that healthcare systems should provide the institutional support for facilitating continuity, questioning and the entrusting of uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.