Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30366937›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2019

Identifying Recurrent Malignant Glioma after Treatment Using Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MR Imaging: A Validation Study with Image-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy.

Shanshan Jiang, Charles G Eberhart, Michael Lim, Hye-Young Heo, Yi Zhang, Lindsay Blair, Zhibo Wen, Matthias Holdhoff, Doris Lin, Peng Huang and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Human liver CEST imaging at 7 T: Impact ofMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shanshan JiangDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Charles G EberhartDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael LimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hye-Young HeoDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lindsay BlairDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Zhibo WenDepartment of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Matthias HoldhoffDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Doris LinDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peng HuangDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8678-8999
Huamin QinDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alfredo Quinones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jon D WeingartDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peter B BarkerDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Martin G PomperDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
John LaterraDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peter C M van ZijlDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jaishri O BlakeleyDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. jzhou@mri.jhu.edu jblakel3@jhmi.edu.
Jinyuan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. jzhou@mri.jhu.edu jblakel3@jhmi.edu.

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Novel Approaches for CEST Labeling, Detection, Quantification and TranslationR01EB015032 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2011 to 2019
$3.9M
Amide Proton Transfer (APT) MRI of Brain Tumors at 3T and 7TR01EB009731 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2009 to 2016
$2.9M
Role of NKCC1 on Brain Tumor Stem Cell Migration After EGF and Slit-2 StimulationR01NS070024 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QUINONES-HINOJOSA, ALFREDO · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
Academic-Industrial Partnership to Develop Clinical Brain Cancer ImagingR01CA166171 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM, ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
Amide Proton Transfer (APT) MRI of Brain Tumors at 3TR01CA228188 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
Development of Novel Functional Markers for TBI Using Molecular MRIUG3NS106937 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KOEHLER, RAYMOND CHARLES, ZHOU, JINYUAN · 2018 to 2019
$859k
Highly Accelerated Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI Using Compressed SensingR21CA227783 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HEO, HYE YOUNG · 2018 to 2019
$385k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166171NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228188NCI NIH HHS R21 CA227783NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009731NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015032NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070024NINDS NIH HHS UG3 NS106937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify the accuracy of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI for identifying active glioma after treatment via radiographically guided stereotactic tissue validation.

resultsEighteen of 21 patients had recurrent tumor, and 3 had treatment effect on clinical pathology. In 12 patients, there were multiple histopathologic assignments confirmed within the same tumor. Of the 64 total specimens, 20 specimens were active glioma, 27 mixed active and quiescent glioma, and 17 quiescent/no identifiable tumor. APTw signal intensity and histopathologic assignment, cellularity, and proliferation index had significant positive correlations (

conclusionsAPTw imaging hyperintensity may be a marker of active malignant glioma. It is able to distinguish between regions of heterogeneous abnormality on anatomic brain MRI with high sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBiomarkersBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansImage-Guided BiopsyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30366937
PMCPMC6335169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.