Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30366884›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2019

Limited role of Chromogranin A as clinical biomarker for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Alessandra Pulvirenti, Deepthi Rao, Caitlin A Mcintyre, Mithat Gonen, Laura H Tang, David S Klimstra, Martin Fleisher, Lakshmi V Ramanathan, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Peter J Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. NETest2.0Cancers · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Differential diagnosis and predictive markers of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET).Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alessandra PulvirentiDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Deepthi RaoDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Caitlin A McintyreDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Laura H TangDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
David S KlimstraDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Martin FleisherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lakshmi V RamanathanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Diane Reidy-LagunesDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter J AllenDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: allenp@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerum Chromogranin A (CgA) is widely used as a biomarker for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). The aim of this study was to investigate the value of CgA as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for well-differentiated PanNETs.

methodsPatients with well-differentiated PanNET and a baseline CgA measurement, between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed. The diagnostic value was determined by comparing CgA values from patients with PanNETs to those with other pancreatic neoplasms and healthy controls. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to investigate the CgA prognostic significance.

resultsNinety-nine patients met inclusion criteria. As a diagnostic marker, CgA had a sensitivity of 66%, specificity of 95%, and overall accuracy of 71%. The use of PPIs was associated with a higher CgA level (p = 0.015). When excluding patients on PPIs, CgA accuracy in distinguishing PanNETs from other pancreatic neoplasms was 66%, the sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 75% respectively. Elevated CgA (p = 0.004), Ki67% (p < 0.001), tumor grade (p < 0.001) and stage of disease (p = 0.036) were associated with disease-specific survival.

conclusionCgA has a limited role as a diagnostic biomarker for well-differentiated PanNETs. An elevated CgA level may have prognostic value but its role should be further investigated with respect to other known pathological factors.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesChromogranin AFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorChromogranin A

Identifiers

PMID30366884
PMCPMC8720376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.