Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30366459›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2018

Postponing Pregnancy Through Oocyte Cryopreservation for Social Reasons: Considerations Regarding Clinical Practice and the Socio-Psychological and Bioethical Issues Involved.

Mara Simopoulou, Konstantinos Sfakianoudis, Panagiotis Bakas, Polina Giannelou, Christina Papapetrou, Theodoros Kalampokas, Anna Rapani, Ekaterini Chatzaki, Maria Lambropoulou, Chrysoula Lourida and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oocyte Biobanks: Old Assumptions and New Challenges.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Effect of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on theJournal of human reproductive sciences
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mara SimopoulouDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, Greece. marasimopoulou@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1000-9100
Konstantinos SfakianoudisCentre for Human Reproduction, Genesis Athens Clinic, 14⁻16, Papanikoli, 15232 Athens, Greece. sfakianosc@yahoo.gr.
Panagiotis BakasAssisted Conception Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76, Vasilisis Sofias Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece. p_bakas@yahoo.com.
Polina GiannelouDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, Greece. lina.giannelou@gmail.com.
Christina PapapetrouAssisted Conception Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76, Vasilisis Sofias Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece. christina.papapetrou@gmail.com.
Theodoros KalampokasAssisted Conception Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76, Vasilisis Sofias Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece. kalamp@yahoo.com.
Anna RapaniDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, Greece. rapanianna@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7636-5848
Ekaterini ChatzakiLaboratory of Histology-Embryology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece. achatzak@med.duth.gr.
Maria LambropoulouLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece. mlambrop@med.duth.gr.
Chrysoula LouridaAssisted Conception Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76, Vasilisis Sofias Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece. chrisalouri@hotmail.com.
Efthymios DeligeoroglouAssisted Conception Unit, 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 76, Vasilisis Sofias Avenue, 11528 Athens, Greece. edeligeo@aretaieio.uoa.gr.
Konstantinos PantosCentre for Human Reproduction, Genesis Athens Clinic, 14⁻16, Papanikoli, 15232 Athens, Greece. info@pantos.gr.
Michael KoutsilierisDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75, Mikras Asias, 11527 Athens, Greece. mkoutsil@med.uoa.gr.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRDemocritus University of Thrace · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oocyte freezing for 'social reasons' refers to women of reproductive age who are aiming to prolong, protect and secure their fertility. The term emerged to describe application of the highly promising technique, namely vitrification on oocytes retrieved through controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) from women intending to preserve their fertility for social reasons. These women opt to cryopreserve their oocytes at a point in their life when they need to postpone childbearing on the grounds of so called 'social' reasons. These reasons may include a highly driven career, absence of an adequate partner, financial instability, or personal reasons that make them feel unprepared for motherhood. This is a sensitive and multifaceted issue that entails medical, bioethical and socio-psychological components. The latest trend and the apparent increase noted on oocyte freezing for 'social reasons' has prompted our team of fertility specialists, embryologists, obstetricians, gynecologists and psychologists to proceed with a thorough, critical and all-inclusive comprehensive analysis. The wide range of findings of this analysis involve concerns of embryology and epigenetics that shape decisions made in the IVF laboratory, issues regarding obstetric and perinatal concerns on the pregnancy concluding from these oocytes and the respective delivery management and neonatal data, to the social and bioethical impact of this trend's application. This literature review refers to matters rising from the moment the 'idea' of this option is 'birthed' in a woman's thoughts, to proceeding and executing it clinically, up until the point of the pediatric follow up of the children born. We aim to shed light to the controversial issue of oocyte freezing, while objectively exhibit all aspects regarding this complex matter, as well as to respectfully approach how could the prospect of our future expectations be shaped from the impact of its application.

Indexed as

OocytesVitrificationBioethical IssuesCryopreservationFemaleFertilityFertilization in VitroGestational CarriersHumansMaternal AgePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsReproductive BehaviorReproductive Physiological Phenomenaassisted reproductionbioethicsextending fertilityoocyte vitrificationreproductive psychologysocial reasons

Identifiers

PMID30366459
PMCPMC6262467
OpenAlexW2753450121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.