Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30366435›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Full in-Office Guided Surgery with Open Selective Tooth-Supported Templates: A Prospective Clinical Study on 20 Patients.

Francesco Guido Mangano, Uli Hauschild, Oleg Admakin

Abstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Harnessing AI in prosthodontics and implant dentistry: An umbrella review of systematic evidence.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: Patients' Experience and Perspectives.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025
    Review
  4. Beyond Accuracy: Clinical Outcomes of Computer Assisted Implant Surgery.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System Workflow for Implant Supported Full Arch Prosthesis: A Case Series.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONEInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesco Guido ManganoLecturer, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy. francescomangano1@mclink.net.
Uli HauschildPrivate Practice, 18038 San Remo, Italy. hauschild@dentaldesign.biz.
Oleg AdmakinProfessor, Department of Prevention and Communal Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119992 Moscow, Russia. admakin1966@mail.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuided implant surgery appears to have several benefits, such as the possibility of inserting flapless implants in a prosthetically driven manner, avoiding dangerous anatomical structures. However, to date, only a few surgeons routinely use guided surgery in partially edentulous patients.

aimTo present the results obtained with tooth-supported surgical templates characterized by an innovative open design with selective support, and manufactured via a full in-office procedure with a low-cost desktop 3D printer.

methodsOver a two-year period (2016⁻2018), all partially edentulous patients with one to three missing teeth (in maxilla and/or mandible), referred to a private dental practice for restoration with dental implants, were considered for inclusion in this prospective clinical study. An intraoral scanner (CS 3600

resultsTwenty (20) partially edentulous patients (9 males, 11 females; mean age 54.4 ± 9.4 years) were included in the study; 28 open, selective, tooth-supported templates were designed with the aim of inserting 38 implants. Among the surgical templates, 24 had optimal fit and stability, three had optimal fit and sufficient stability, and only one had inadequate fit and unsatisfactory stability and was therefore not suitable for clinical use. The average time of the intervention was 15.7 ± 5.2 min per template. No intra-operative complications were reported, but one implant was not stable at placement and had to be removed. In total, 36 implants were restored with 10 two-unit fixed partial prostheses and 16 single crowns. All implants were successfully functioning at one year, even if, in two single crowns, minor prosthetic complications (abutment screw loosening) occurred.

conclusionsFull in-office guided surgery with open, selective, tooth-supported templates seem to represent a clinically predictable surgical procedure to restore partially edentulous patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these positive outcomes.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAdultAgedAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedOral Surgical ProceduresProspective Studiescomplicationsdental implantsguided implant surgerysurvivaltemplate fittemplate stability

Identifiers

PMID30366435
PMCPMC6266226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.