Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30366416›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Population-Based Linkage of Big Data in Dental Research.

Tim Joda, Tuomas Waltimo, Christiane Pauli-Magnus, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Nicola U Zitzmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Big Data and Digitalization in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Digital Oral Medicine for the Elderly.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  18. Recent Trends and Future Direction of Dental Research in the Digital Era.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tim JodaDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. tim.joda@unibas.ch.
Tuomas WaltimoDepartment of Oral Health & Medicine Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. tuomas.waltimo@unibas.ch.
Christiane Pauli-MagnusDepartment of Clinical Research & Clinical Trial Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. christiane.pauli-magnus@usb.ch.
Nicole Probst-HenschDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute Basel, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland. nicole.probst@unibas.ch.
Nicola U ZitzmannDepartment of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. n.zitzmann@unibas.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population-based linkage of patient-level information opens new strategies for dental research to identify unknown correlations of diseases, prognostic factors, novel treatment concepts and evaluate healthcare systems. As clinical trials have become more complex and inefficient, register-based controlled (clinical) trials (RC(C)T) are a promising approach in dental research. RC(C)Ts provide comprehensive information on hard-to-reach populations, allow observations with minimal loss to follow-up, but require large sample sizes with generating high level of external validity. Collecting data is only valuable if this is done systematically according to harmonized and inter-linkable standards involving a universally accepted general patient consent. Secure data anonymization is crucial, but potential re-identification of individuals poses several challenges. Population-based linkage of big data is a game changer for epidemiological surveys in Public Health and will play a predominant role in future dental research by influencing healthcare services, research, education, biotechnology, insurance, social policy and governmental affairs.

Indexed as

Big DataDental ResearchHumansbig dataepidemiological researchpatient-generated health data (PGHD)public healthregister-based controlled (clinical) trials [RC(C)T]

Identifiers

PMID30366416
PMCPMC6265733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.