Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30365341›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2019

Transcriptomic Signatures in Sepsis and a Differential Response to Steroids. From the VANISH Randomized Trial.

David B Antcliffe, Katie L Burnham, Farah Al-Beidh, Shalini Santhakumaran, Stephen J Brett, Charles J Hinds, Deborah Ashby, Julian C Knight, Anthony C Gordon

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04280497 (A Multicentre Concealed-Allocation Multi-arms Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to Identify the Best Sepsis Population for Corticotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 207 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
207citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04280497 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Multicentre Concealed-Allocation Multi-arms Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to Identify the Best Sepsis Population for Corticotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2025Enrolled1,800ConditionsSepsisArmsAdministration procedures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

207 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. A neutrophil subset defined by intracellular olfactomedin 4 is associated with mortality in sepsis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2021
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

147 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David B Antcliffe1 Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1846-9160
Katie L Burnham3 Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8680-2933
Farah Al-Beidh1 Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shalini Santhakumaran4 Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and.ORCID 0000-0003-0988-9339
Stephen J Brett2 Centre for Perioperative and Critical Care Research, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4545-8413
Charles J Hinds5 Intensive Care Unit, Barts and the London, Queen Mary School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Deborah Ashby4 Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; and.ORCID 0000-0003-3146-7466
Julian C Knight3 Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0377-5536
Anthony C Gordon1 Section of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0419-547X

Funding

Department of Health NIHR/CS/009/007Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 204969/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThere remains uncertainty about the role of corticosteroids in sepsis with clear beneficial effects on shock duration, but conflicting survival effects. Two transcriptomic sepsis response signatures (SRSs) have been identified. SRS1 is relatively immunosuppressed, whereas SRS2 is relatively immunocompetent.

objectivesWe aimed to categorize patients based on SRS endotypes to determine if these profiles influenced response to either norepinephrine or vasopressin, or to corticosteroids in septic shock.

methodsA post hoc analysis was performed of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial in septic shock (VANISH [Vasopressin vs. Norepinephrine as Initial Therapy in Septic Shock]). Patients were included within 6 hours of onset of shock and were randomized to receive norepinephrine or vasopressin followed by hydrocortisone or placebo. Genome-wide gene expression profiling was performed and SRS endotype was determined by a previously established model using seven discriminant genes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsSamples were available from 176 patients: 83 SRS1 and 93 SRS2. There was no significant interaction between SRS group and vasopressor assignment (P = 0.50). However, there was an interaction between assignment to hydrocortisone or placebo, and SRS endotype (P = 0.02). Hydrocortisone use was associated with increased mortality in those with an SRS2 phenotype (odds ratio = 7.9; 95% confidence interval = 1.6-39.9).

conclusionsTranscriptomic profile at onset of septic shock was associated with response to corticosteroids. Those with the immunocompetent SRS2 endotype had significantly higher mortality when given corticosteroids compared with placebo. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (ISRCTN 20769191).

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneImmunocompetenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrinePhenotypeSepsisShock, SepticSurvival AnalysisTranscriptomeHydrocortisoneNorepinephrineVasopressinscorticosteroidsnorepinephrinesepsistranscriptomicsvasopressin

Identifiers

PMID30365341
PMCPMC6467319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.