Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30365075›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2019

The novel prognostic marker, EHMT2, is involved in cell proliferation via HSPD1 regulation in breast cancer.

Seon-Kyu Kim, Kwangho Kim, Jea-Woon Ryu, Tae-Young Ryu, Jung Hwa Lim, Jung-Hwa Oh, Jeong-Ki Min, Cho-Rok Jung, Ryuji Hamamoto, Mi-Young Son and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Critical Roles ofBiomolecules · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Seon-Kyu KimKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Kwangho KimKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Jea-Woon RyuKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Young RyuKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Jung Hwa LimKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hwa OhKorea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Ki MinKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Cho-Rok JungKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Ryuji HamamotoDivision of Molecular Modification and Cancer Biology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104‑0045, Japan.
Mi-Young SonKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Dae-Soo KimKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Soo ChoKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 305‑333, Republic of Korea.
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KRKorea Institute of Toxicology · KRNational Cancer Centre Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular classifications of breast cancer (BRC), such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), luminal A and luminal B, have been developed to reduce unnecessary treatment by dividing patients with BRC into low‑ and high‑risk progression groups. However, these methods do not cover all of the pathological characteristics of BRC, and investigations into novel prognostic/therapeutic markers are thus continually required. In this study, we identified the overexpression of the histone methyltransferase, euchromatic histone‑lysine N‑methyltransferase 2 (EHMT2) in BRC samples (n=1,222) and normal samples (n=113) derived from the TCGA portal by performing a BRC tissue microarray. EHMT2 overexpression was clearly associated with a poor prognosis in multiple cohorts of patients with BRC (total, n=1,644). Furthermore, the knockdown of EHMT2 expression affected cell apoptosis via the downregulation and re‑localization of heat shock protein family D (Hsp60) member 1 (HSPD1). In addition, a statistically significant positive correlation between EHMT2 and HSPD1 expression was revealed in the clinical cohorts. On the whole, the findings of this study may assist the development of novel therapeutic strategies and provide a prognostic marker (EHMT2) for patients with BRC.

Indexed as

Up-RegulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationChaperonin 60FemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistocompatibility AntigensHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansMCF-7 CellsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorChaperonin 60EHMT2 protein, humanHistocompatibility AntigensHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHSPD1 protein, humanMitochondrial Proteinsbreast cancercorrelationseuchromatic histone lysine N methyltransferase 2heat shock protein family D (Hsp60) member 1prognostic value

Identifiers

PMID30365075
PMCPMC6254934
OpenAlexW2898562256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.