Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364951›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

DoriC 10.0: an updated database of replication origins in prokaryotic genomes including chromosomes and plasmids.

Hao Luo, Feng Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recombineering in Non-Model Bacteria.Current protocols · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hao LuoDepartment of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Feng GaoDepartment of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Tianjin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DoriC, a database of replication origins, was initially created to present the bacterial oriCs predicted by Ori-Finder or determined by experiments in 2007. DoriC 5.0, an updated database of oriC regions in both bacterial and archaeal genomes, was published in the 2013 Nucleic Acids Research database issue. Now, the latest release DoriC 10, a large-scale update of replication origins in prokaryotic genomes including chromosomes and plasmids, has been presented with a completely redesigned user interface, which is freely available at http://tubic.org/doric/ and http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/doric/. In the current release, the database of DoriC has made significant improvements compared with version 5.0 as follows: (i) inclusion of oriCs on more bacterial chromosomes increased from 1633 to 7580; (ii) inclusion of oriCs on more archaeal chromosomes increased from 86 to 226; (iii) inclusion of 1209 plasmid replication origins retrieved from NCBI annotations or predicted by in silico analysis; (iv) inclusion of more replication origin elements on bacterial chromosomes including DnaA-trio motifs. Now, DoriC becomes the most complete and scalable database of replication origins in prokaryotic genomes, and facilitates the studies in large-scale oriC data mining, strand-biased analyses and replication origin predictions.

Indexed as

ChromosomesComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDNA ReplicationReplication OriginPlasmidsProkaryotic CellsSoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceWeb Browser

Identifiers

PMID30364951
PMCPMC6323995
OpenAlexW2898439045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.