ArticleJournal of veterinary research2018
Detection and Molecular Analysis of Bovine Enteric Norovirus and Nebovirus in Turkey.
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential Novel Genotype of "Bopivirus B" from Sheep in Türkiye: Epidemiology and Molecular Characterization.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Molecular characteristics of bovine norovirus and nebovirus in Swedish dairy herds.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Genomics Investigation of Neboviruses Reveals Distinct Codon Usage Patterns and Host Specificity.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Literature Review: Coinfection in Young Ruminant Livestock-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Molecular surveillance of viral pathogens associated with diarrhea in pre-weaned Korean native calves.Tropical animal health and production · 2020Article
- First detection of neboviruses in yak (Bos grunniens) and identification of a novel neboviruses based on complete genome.Veterinary microbiology · 2019Article
- Animals as Reservoir for Human Norovirus.Viruses · 2019Review
- Molecular characterization of bovine noroviruses and neboviruses in Turkey: detection of recombinant strains.Archives of virology · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBovine Norovirus (BoNeV) which has been confirmed in Asia, America, and Europe, seems to be distributed worldwide, even though only reported from a number of countries. Bovine noroviruses are predominantly detected in diarrhoeic animals rather than neboviruses. The study reveals the importance of noro- and neboviruses in early age diarrhoea of calves. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 127 stool samples were collected from three provinces located in the central region of Turkey. Samples were subjected to nucleic acid isolation and reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Positive samples were sequenced and analysed.
resultsAccording to PCR, five samples (3.93%) were found to be positive for bovine norovirus while 32 (25.19%) samples were found to be positive for bovine nebovirus. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the novel Turkish norovirus strains were found to be of genotype III.2 and all novel neboviruses were substituted under Nebraska-like strains.
conclusionAlthough predominantly bovine noroviruses are detected worldwide, the study indicated that bovine neboviruses were more prevalent in the studied area. We suggest that bovine neboviruses are more frequently responsible for calf diarrhoea than supposed by virologists. This is also the first report of neboviruses other than Kirklareli virus which is distantly related to neboviruses detected in Turkey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.