Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364890›Full record

ReviewUltrasound international open2018

Ultrasound and Cystic Echinococcosis.

Enrico Brunetti, Francesca Tamarozzi, Calum Macpherson, Carlo Filice, Markus Schindler Piontek, Adnan Kabaalioglu, Yi Dong, Nathan Atkinson, Joachim Richter, Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasound international open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Emergency radiology in displaced populations: imaging and practical challenges.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cystic Echinococcosis in the Early 2020s: A Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Enrico BrunettiSan Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Unit of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca TamarozziCenter for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Calum MacphersonSt.George's University, Ultrasound, Grenada, India.
Carlo FiliceSan Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Unit of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Pavia, Italy.
Markus Schindler PiontekCaritas Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Medical Clinic 2, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Adnan KabaaliogluAkdeniz University, Radiology, Antalya, Turkey.
Yi DongZhongshan Hospital, Ultrasound, Shanghai, China.
Nathan AtkinsonJohn Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Department of Gastroenterology, Oxford, New Zealand.
Joachim RichterInstitute of Tropical Medicine and International Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Dagmar Schreiber-DietrichCaritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Department of Pediatrics, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Christoph F DietrichCaritas-Krankenhaus, Medizinische Klinik 2, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of imaging techniques in clinical practice 40 years ago changed the clinical management of many diseases, including cystic echinococcosis (CE). For the first time cysts were clearly seen before surgery. Among the available imaging techniques, ultrasound (US) has unique properties that can be used to study and manage cystic echinococcosis. It is harmless, can image almost all organs and systems, can be repeated as often as required, is portable, requires no patient preparation, is relatively inexpensive and guides diagnosis, treatment and follow-up without radiation exposure and harm to the patient. US is the only imaging technique which can be used in field settings to assess CE prevalence because it can be run even on solar power or a small generator in remote field locations. Thanks to US classifications, the concept of stage-specific treatments was introduced and because US is repeatable, the scientific community has gained a clearer understanding of the natural history of the disease. This paper reviews the scope of US in CE, describes its strengths and weaknesses compared to other imaging techniques and its relationship with serodiagnosis and discusses sonographic features that may be helpful in differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

albendazoleguidelinesliver cystspuncture– aspiration–injection–re-aspiration (PAIR)

Identifiers

PMID30364890
PMCPMC6199172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.