Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364785›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2018

Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial.

Carrie M Nielson, Jennifer S Rivelli, Morgan J Fuoco, Victoria R Gawlik, Ricardo Jimenez, Amanda F Petrik, Gloria D Coronado

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01742065 (Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01742065 nacompletednot on this map

Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2013 to 2018Enrolled62,155ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsAuto Plus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Randomized Controlled Trial of Advance Notification Phone Calls vs Text Messages Prior to Mailed Fecal Test Outreach.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Pharmacist-Led Discharge Transitions of Care Interventions for Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carrie M NielsonCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Jennifer S RivelliCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Morgan J FuocoCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Victoria R GawlikSea Mar Community Health Centers, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ricardo JimenezSea Mar Community Health Centers, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amanda F PetrikCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
Gloria D CoronadoCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority PopulationsUH3CA188640 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2014 to 2017
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA188640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of annual mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach is highest when return rates are optimized, which is aided by patient reminders. In a pilot patient-randomized controlled trial in two western Washington clinics of the Sea Mar Community Health Centers, we compared the effectiveness of two phone-based approaches to mailed FIT outreach reminders. In fall 2016, patients ages 50-75, due for colorectal cancer screening, and with a visit in the previous year at either of two clinics, were mailed an introductory letter and FIT. Those who did not return the FIT within 3 weeks (N = 427) were randomized to receive either: a) a series of up to 6 automated phone reminders; or b) the combination of automated and live phone reminders (up to 6 in total). The sole outcome was FIT return within 6 months after the FIT mailing. FIT completion rates were similar in the groups assigned to receive automated calls vs automated plus live calls (40% vs 39%; p = 0.89). The effectiveness of FIT reminder mode differed by language preference (p for interaction = 0.03): among Spanish-preferring patients (n = 106), FIT return rates were higher in the automated-only group than to the auto- plus live-call group (62% vs 39%, p = 0.02). Among English-preferring patients, no difference in modes was observed (n = 279, 32% vs 34%, p = 0.74). We observed no added benefit of live reminder calls in a mailed FIT plus automated call reminder program; our findings may inform efforts to efficiently optimize mailed-FIT outreach programs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01742065.

Indexed as

Colorectal neoplasmsCommunity health centersEarly detection of cancerLanguage

Identifiers

PMID30364785
PMCPMC6199768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.