ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2018
The Four Fixation Points of the Axis: Technique and Case Report.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInstrumentation of the axis can be accomplished through a variety of techniques including transarticular screw fixation, pars and pedicle screw fixation, translaminar screw fixation, and posterior wiring. We report on the evolution of the axial 4-screw technique.
methodsRetrospective case review. After exposure of posterior spinal elements, the medial and superior walls of the C2 pedicle were identified from within the spinal canal. A high-speed drill was then advanced under lateral fluoroscopy, which guided craniocaudal angulation. Medial angulation was based on anatomic landmarks and preoperative imaging. This was followed by placement of translaminar screws according to the technique described by Wright. When extending the construct into the subaxial spine or the occiput, lateral connectors are placed in translaminar screws, which are usually more offset. The rod is directly connected to the pedicle screws, which are usually more in alignment with the subaxial/occipital instrumentation.
resultsTwo male patients ages 56 and 58 underwent posterior instrumentation of the axis employing a combination of pedicle and laminar polyaxial screws. Indications included multilevel spinal cord compression and deformity in a patient with Down syndrome and cervical meningioma, respectively. Follow-up was 1 year and 5 years, respectively. Medical complications (N = 2) occurred in the patient with Down syndrome resulting in prolonged intubation with tracheostomy placement. Reduction was maintained in both patients at last follow-up. There were no neurologic, vascular, or instrumentation related complications.
conclusionsThe axis serves as a versatile anchor point and offers 4 potential points of fixation. Lateral connectors play a crucial role and allow for incorporation of the C2 screws with the rest of the construct. Local anatomy will dictate the necessity and ability to place instrumentation and detailed preoperative planning is of paramount importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.