Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364762›Full record

Article... Health innovations and point-of-care technologies conference. Health innovations and point-of-care technologies conference2017

Agile Co-Development for Clinical Adoption and Adaptation of Innovative Technologies.

Vaishnavi Kannan, Mujeeb A Basit, Josh E Youngblood, Trenton D Bryson, Seth M Toomay, Jason S Fish, Duwayne L Willett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ... Health innovations and point-of-care technologies conference. Health innovations and point-of-care technologies conference, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "Build better bones": development, launch, and future directions of a multilingual, user-centered website for osteoporosis management.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. User stories as lightweight requirements for agile clinical decision support development.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vaishnavi KannanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390 USA.
Mujeeb A BasitUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390 USA.
Josh E YoungbloodUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390 USA.
Trenton D BrysonUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390 USA.
Seth M ToomayUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390 USA.
Jason S FishUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390 USA.
Duwayne L WillettUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390 USA.

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even the most innovative healthcare technologies provide patient benefits only when adopted by clinicians and/or patients in actual practice. Yet realizing optimal positive impact from a new technology for the widest range of individuals who would benefit remains elusive. In software and new product development, iterative rapid-cycle "agile" methods more rapidly provide value, mitigate failure risks, and adapt to customer feedback. Co-development between builders and customers is a key agile principle. But how does one accomplish co-development with busy clinicians? In this paper, we discuss four practical agile co-development practices found helpful clinically: (1) User stories for lightweight requirements; (2) Time-boxed development for collaborative design and prompt course correction; (3) Automated acceptance test driven development, with clinician-vetted specifications; and (4) Monitoring of clinician interactions after release, for rapid-cycle product adaptation and evolution. In the coming wave of innovation in healthcare apps ushered in by open APIs to EHRs, learning rapidly what new product features work well for clinicians and patients will become even more crucial.

Identifiers

PMID30364762
PMCPMC6197812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.