Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364677›Full record

ArticleIEEE sensors journal2018

Accelerometer-Based Detection of Food Intake in Free-living Individuals.

Muhammad Farooq, Edward Sazonov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Selective Content Removal for Egocentric Wearable Camera in Nutritional Studies.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020
    Article
  14. Automatic Count of Bites and Chews From Videos of Eating Episodes.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Voice-assisted Food Recall using Voice Assistants.HCI International 2022 - late breaking papers : 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2022, virtual event, June 26 - July 1, 2022, proceedings. HCI for health, well-being, universal access and healthy aging. ...
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad FarooqDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA.
Edward SazonovDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA.
University of Alabama · US

Funding

Assessing Food Intake with the Automatic Ingestion MonitorR01DK100796 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI MCCRORY, MEGAN A, SAZONOV, EDWARD S · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of using a 3-axis accelerometer attached to the frame of eyeglasses for automatic detection of food intake. A 3D acceleration sensor was attached to the temple of the regular eyeglasses. Ten participants wore the device in two visits (first, laboratory; second, free-living) on different days, reporting the food intake episodes using a pushbutton. Hold-one-out procedure was used to test the algorithm for food intake detection. The accelerometer signal was split into epochs of varying durations (3s, 5s, 10s 15s, 20s, 25s, and 30s); 152 time and frequency domain features were computed for each epoch. A two-stage procedure was used for finding the best feature set suitable for classification. The first stage used minimum Redundancy and Maximum Relevance (mRMR) to get the 30 top-ranked features and the second stage used forward feature selection along with a kNN classifier to get the optimum feature set for each hold-one-out set. The best average F1-score combined from laboratory and free-living experiments was 87.9 +/- 13.8% (Mean±Standard Deviation) for 20s epochs; and 84.7 +/- 7.95% for the shortest epoch of 3s. The results suggest that accelerometer may provide a compelling alternative to other sensor modalities, as the proposed sensor does not require direct attachment to the body and, therefore, significantly improves user comfort and social acceptability of the food intake monitoring system.

Indexed as

AccelerometerChewingDietary intakeEating recognitionEyeglassesFood intake detectionMonitoringWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID30364677
PMCPMC6197813
OpenAlexW2791600389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.