Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364659›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2018

Retrograde intrarenal surgery: An expanding role in treatment of urolithiasis.

María Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero, Steeve Doizi, Etienne Xavier Keller, Vincent De Coninck, Olivier Traxer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Flexible ureteroscopy with novel flexible ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Medical and surgical management of urolithiasis.Asian journal of urology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María Rodríguez-Monsalve HerreroDepartment of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Steeve DoiziDepartment of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Etienne Xavier KellerDepartment of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Vincent De ConinckDepartment of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Olivier TraxerDepartment of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past 3 decades, the surgical management of kidney stones has undergone many technological advances and one is the development of the flexible ureteroscopy. The development of this instrument as well as ancillary equipment such as baskets, graspers, and others, and improvements in lithotripsy with Holmium: YAG laser have led to expand its indications with diagnostic and therapeutic management of medical issues of the upper urinary tract such as urolithiasis and urothelial tumors. The objective of this review is to describe its indications and results in the different scenarios for the treatment of urinary stones.

Indexed as

EndourologyRetrograde intrarenal surgeryUreteroscopyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID30364659
PMCPMC6197554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.