Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364613›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2018

Defining metabolic activity of nephrolithiasis - Appropriate evaluation and follow-up of stone formers.

Daniel A Wollin, Adam G Kaplan, Glenn M Preminger, Pietro Manuel Ferraro, Antonio Nouvenne, Andrea Tasca, Emanuele Croppi, Giovanni Gambaro, Ita P Heilberg

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Medical and surgical management of urolithiasis.Asian journal of urology · 2018
    Article
  12. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones in children <5 years of age.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel A WollinDuke Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center, Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Adam G KaplanDuke Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center, Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Glenn M PremingerDuke Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center, Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Pietro Manuel FerraroColumbus-Gemelli University Hospital, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Antonio NouvenneUniversity of Parma, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Parma, Italy.
Andrea TascaS. Bortolo Hospital, Department of Urology, Vicenza, Italy.
Emanuele CroppiColumbus-Gemelli University Hospital, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni GambaroColumbus-Gemelli University Hospital, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Ita P HeilbergUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Nephrology Division, São Paulo, Brazil.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITDuke Medical Center · USOspedale San Bortolo · ITUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the variation in metabolic evaluation and medical management of kidney stone disease, this consensus review was created to discuss the metabolic activity of nephrolithiasis, define the difference between single and recurrent stone formers, and develop a schema for metabolic and radiologic follow-up. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies of metabolic evaluation and follow-up of patients with nephrolithiasis. Both single and recurrent stone formers share many similarities in metabolic profiles. The study group determined that based on an assessment of risk for stone recurrence and metabolic activity, single and recurrent stone formers should be evaluated comprehensively, including two 24 h urine studies on a random diet. Targeted medication and dietary recommendations are effective for many patients in reducing the risk of stone recurrence. Follow-up of those with stone disease should be obtained depending on the level of metabolic activity of the patient, the risk of chronic kidney disease and the risk of osteoporosis/osteopenia. A standard scheme includes a baseline metabolic profile, a repeat study 3-6 months after initiation of treatment, and then yearly when stable, with abdominal imaging obtained every 1-2 years.

Indexed as

Follow-upMedical managementMetabolic evaluationUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID30364613
PMCPMC6197397
OpenAlexW2810658604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.