Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364419›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2018

The Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) guide: developing a clinical decision support tool to simplify, standardise and strengthen primary healthcare delivery.

Ruth Cornick, Sandy Picken, Camilla Wattrus, Ajibola Awotiwon, Emma Carkeek, Juliet Hannington, Pearl Spiller, Eric Bateman, Tanya Doherty, Merrick Zwarenstein and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Primary health care approach to rheumatic heart disease management.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Managing mental health disorders: Experiences of primary care providers in rural South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ruth CornickKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sandy PickenKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2651-5980
Camilla WattrusKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2075-7903
Ajibola AwotiwonKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Emma CarkeekKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3202-1848
Juliet HanningtonKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Pearl SpillerKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Eric BatemanKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tanya DohertySouth African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Merrick ZwarensteinCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0162-7027
Lara FairallKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the primary health worker in a low/middle-income country (LMIC) setting, delivering quality primary care is challenging. This is often complicated by clinical guidance that is out of date, inconsistent and informed by evidence from high-income countries that ignores LMIC resource constraints and burden of disease. The Knowledge Translation Unit (KTU) of the University of Cape Town Lung Institute has developed, implemented and evaluated a health systems intervention in South Africa, and localised it to Botswana, Nigeria, Ethiopia and Brazil, that simplifies and standardises the care delivered by primary health workers while strengthening the system in which they work. At the core of this intervention, called Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK), is a clinical decision support tool, the PACK guide. This paper describes the development of the guide over an 18-year period and explains the design features that have addressed what the patient, the clinician and the health system need from clinical guidance, and have made it, in the words of a South African primary care nurse, 'A tool for every day for every patient'. It describes the lessons learnt during the development process that the KTU now applies to further development, maintenance and in-country localisation of the guide: develop clinical decision support in context first, involve local stakeholders in all stages, leverage others' evidence databases to remain up to date and ensure content development, updating and localisation articulate with implementation.

Indexed as

health systemspublic healthtreatment

Identifiers

PMID30364419
PMCPMC6195147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.