ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018
Effects of a Commercial Microbial Agent on the Bacterial Communities in Shrimp Culture System.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Bullfrog Tadpoles: A Comparative Study Across Nutritional Stages.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Host-microbiome interaction in fish and shellfish: An overview.Fish and shellfish immunology reports · 2023Review
- Article
- Enterococcus faecium are associated with the modification of gut microbiota and shrimp post-larvae survival.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Shrimp AHPND Causing Vibrio anguillarum Infection: Quantitative Diagnosis and Identifying Antagonistic Bacteria.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- A Tripartite Microbial-Environment Network Indicates How Crucial Microbes Influence the Microbial Community Ecology.Microbial ecology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Commercial microbial agents (e.g., probiotics, microbial products, microorganism preparation et al.) have been widely applied for disease control in shrimp culture. However, the effect of these microbial agents (MA) on shrimp health is unstable and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. The effect of MA can probably be achieved by influencing the bacterial community of shrimp culture system. To test this hypothesis, we used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to investigate the dynamics of both planktonic and intestinal bacterial composition in shrimp culture ponds with or without commercial MA applied weekly. The results showed that MA application increased the temporal turnover rate of bacterioplankton community. Within 1 week, MA-treatment significantly drove bacterioplankton community composition to divert from that without MA-treatment at day 2 after MA application, but the deviation tended to vanish at days 4 and 7. At day 21, a significant difference was observed in shrimp intestinal bacterial community between two groups. The relative abundance of Rhodobacteraceae in shrimp intestine was significantly greater in the MA-treated group than that in the control. However, MA-treatment did not significantly improve the growth or survival ratio of shrimp. This study suggest that MA works in terms of accelerating bacterioplankton community turnover and shifting intestinal bacterial community, however, its effect on shrimp growth might vary greatly and might be improved by optimizing the method in activation and application and more investigation on the microbial ecological process of shrimp culture system is needed before we develop and apply probiotics more efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.