Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30364235›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2018

Biophysical analysis of fluid shear stress induced cellular deformation in a microfluidic device.

Grant M Landwehr, Andrew J Kristof, Sharif M Rahman, Jacob H Pettigrew, Rachael Coates, Joseph B Balhoff, Ursula L Triantafillu, Yonghyun Kim, Adam T Melvin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Grant M LandwehrCain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-0318
Andrew J KristofDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA.
Sharif M RahmanCain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
Jacob H PettigrewCain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
Rachael CoatesCain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
Joseph B BalhoffCain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
Ursula L TriantafilluDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, USA.
Yonghyun KimDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6344-1258
Adam T MelvinCain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-5871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though the majority of breast cancers respond well to primary therapy, a large percentage of patients relapse with metastatic disease, for which there is no treatment. In metastasis, a tumor sheds a small number of cancerous cells, termed circulating tumor cells (CTCs), into the local vasculature, from where they spread throughout the body to form new tumors. As CTCs move through the circulatory system, they experience physiological forces not present in the initial tumor environment, namely, fluid shear stress (FSS). Evidence suggests that CTCs respond to FSS by adopting a more aggressive phenotype; however, to date single-cell morphological changes have not been quantified to support this observation. Furthermore, the methodology of previous studies involves inducing FSS by flowing cells through the tubing, which lacks a precise and tunable control of FSS. Here, a microfluidic approach is used for isolating and characterizing the biophysical response of single breast cancer cells to conditions experienced in the circulatory system during metastasis. To evaluate the single-cell response of multiple breast cancer types, two model circulating tumor cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MCF7, were challenged with FSS at precise magnitudes and durations. As expected, both MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells exhibited greater deformability due to increasing duration and magnitudes of FSS. However, wide variations in single-cell responses were observed. MCF7 cells were found to rapidly deform but reach a threshold value after 5 min of FSS, while MDA-MB-231 cells were observed to deform at a slower rate but with a larger threshold of deformation. This behavioral diversity suggests the presence of distinct cell subpopulations with different phenotypes.

Identifiers

PMID30364235
PMCPMC6192794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.