ArticleDisease markers2018
Identifying the Best Marker Combination in CEA, CA125, CY211, NSE, and SCC for Lung Cancer Screening by Combining ROC Curve and Logistic Regression Analyses: Is It Feasible?
Article in Disease markers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Whole-Brain and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy on Serum Levels of miR-21 and Prognosis for Lung Cancer Metastatic to the Brain.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Trial
- Machine learning-based prediction of intellectual disability in children with autism spectrum disorder: using behavioral observation techniques.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of DNA Methylation in TAC1, SOX17, and RASSF1A for the Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Structured narrative review on lung cancer screening: current evidence, clinical practice implications and implementation insights from a multidisciplinary task force and patient representatives.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- Progress of chronic kidney disease and associated predictors among patients under treatment at Gambi and Felege-Hiwote hospitals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Elevation in Routine Screening Unveils Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma.Cureus · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in differentiating between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Predicting malignant potential of solitary pulmonary nodules in patients with COVID-19 infection: a comprehensive analysis of CT imaging and tumor markers.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Non-Specific Elevated Serum Free Fatty Acids in Lung Cancer Patients: Nutritional or Pathological?Nutrients · 2024Article
- Prevalence of CEA, CA 125, and CA 15-3 serum tumour markers in different regions of Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2024Article
- The Role of Biomarkers in Lung Cancer Screening.Cancers · 2024Review
- Unveiling the best predictive models for early‑onset metastatic cancer: Insights and innovations (Review).Oncology reports · 2024Review
- Detection of the DNA methylation of seven genes contribute to the early diagnosis of lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Analysis of influencing factors of serum SCCA elevation in 309 CAP patients with normal CEA,NSE and CYFRA21-1.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Determination of Tumor Marker Screening for Lung Cancer Using ROC Curves.Disease markers · 2024Article
- Variability of serum CYFRA 21 - 1 and its susceptibility to clinical characteristics in individuals without cancer: a 4-year retrospective analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Identification of potential prognostic markers for lung adenocarcinoma using comprehensive analysis.Molecular medicine reports · 2023Article
- Application of Metal-Based Nanomaterials in In Vitro Diagnosis of Tumor Markers: Summary and Prospect.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of serum biomarkers can aid in the diagnosis of lung cancer. In recent years, an increasing number of lung cancer markers have been identified, and these markers have been reported to have varying diagnostic values. A method to compare the diagnostic value of different combinations of biomarkers needs to be established to identify the best combination. In this study, automatic chemiluminescence analyzers were employed to detect the serum concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CY211), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) in 780 healthy subjects, 650 patients with pneumonia, and 633 patients with lung cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and logistic regression analyses were also used to evaluate the diagnostic value of single and multiple markers of lung cancer. The sensitivities of the five markers alone were lower than 65% for lung cancer screening in healthy subjects and pneumonia patients. SCC was of little value in screening lung cancer. After combining two or more markers, the areas under the curves (AUCs) did not increase with the increase in the number of markers. For healthy subjects, the best marker for lung cancer screening was the combination CEA + CA125, and the positive cutoff range was 0.577 CEA + 0.035 CA125 > 2.084. Additionally, for patients with pneumonia, the best screening markers displayed differences in terms of sex but not age. The best screening marker for male patients with pneumonia was the combination CEA + CY211 with a positive cutoff range of 0.008 CEA + 0.068 CY211 > 0.237, while that for female patients with pneumonia was CEA > 2.73 ng/mL, which could be regarded as positive. These results showed that a two-marker combination is more suitable than a multimarker combination for the serological screening of tumors. Combined ROC curve and logistic regression analyses are effective for identifying the best markers for lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.