ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2018
Beyond conventional secondary prevention in coronary artery disease-what to choose in the era of CANTOS, COMPASS, FOURIER, ODYSSEY and PEGASUS-TIMI 54? A review on contemporary literature.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of concomitant left atrial appendage closure and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation: a randomized pilot study.Heart and vessels · 2023Trial
- Estimating the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in U.S. Veterans Using the SMART Risk Score.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Determinants of perivascular adipose tissue stranding as a novel imaging marker and its relation to inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.Polish journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Perivascular fat imaging by computed tomography (CT): a virtual guide.British journal of pharmacology · 2021Review
- Reduction in GLP-1 secretory capacity may be a novel independent risk factor of coronary artery stenosis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Cardiometabolic-Based Chronic Disease, Addressing Knowledge and Clinical Practice Gaps: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Review
- Prolonged antithrombotic therapy in patients after acute coronary syndrome: A critical appraisal of current European Society of Cardiology guidelines.Cardiology journal · 2020Article
- State-of-the-art review article. Atherosclerosis affecting fat: What can we learn by imaging perivascular adipose tissue?Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyReview
- Impact of One Versus Two Consecutive Doses of Endothelial Cells (EPCs) and EPCs-Derived Condition Medium on Protecting Myocardium from Acute Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with established cardiovascular (CV) disease remain at dramatic residual risk for subsequent events, despite growing evidence in secondary prevention and wider dissemination of intensive treatment. This review focuses on new options in secondary risk prevention as presented by these five major randomized controlled trials (RCT): PEGASUS-TIMI 54, COMPASS, FOURIER, ODYSSEY and CANTOS. Three main therapeutic targets are addressed: residual cholesterol, residual inflammatory and residual thrombotic risk. All of the trials reviewed included patients with stable CV disease on optimal medical treatment with a surprising similar mortality. As of now, evolocumab, alirocumab and ticagrelor are on the market, while rivaroxaban and canakinumab are not yet licensed for the treatment of secondary prevention in CV disease. Although life-style modifications and better utilization of established medical treatment options will remain first-line strategy, new medication is just about to enter the market. Secondary prevention in coronary artery disease (CAD) holds a strong potential to reduce subsequent CV events, even CV death. It seems that a combination of an aggressive lipid-lowering treatment in combination with antithrombotic therapy could improve prognosis significantly (at least for distinct subgroups). Against this background, individual efficacy, risk, and costs have to be considered when identifying patients for each new regime.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.