ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2015
Abnormalities of Masseteric Inhibitory Reflex in Hereditary Geniospasm: Evidence for a Brainstem Myoclonus.
Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hereditary geniospasm in a mother and son treated with botulinum toxin injection: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2021Article
- Effective Treatment of Geniospasm: Case Series and Review of the Literature.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We studied two unrelated families with several members suffering from geniospasm. Here, we aim to clarify the pathophysiology underlying the hereditary geniospasm through testing of brainstem excitability by the recovery cycles of the blink reflex (BR) and the masseteric inhibitory reflex (MIR). The R2 component of the BR and the SP2 component of the MIR and their recovery cycle were analyzed in 3 patients and 8 healthy, age-matched subjects as the control group. Patients with geniospasm exhibited a different excitability of the BR, compared to the control, group, as shown by the larger R2 component area of BR in controls than patients. Notably, the mean recovery index was 0.61 ± 0.19 in geniospasm patients and 0.40 ± 0.15 in controls (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.