Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30363751›Full record

ArticlemHealth2018

Sandra I McCoy, Raluca Buzdugan, Reva Grimball, Lauren Natoli, Christopher M Mejia, Jeffrey D Klausner, Mark R McGrath

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra I McCoySchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Raluca BuzduganSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Reva GrimballSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Lauren NatoliPublic Health Division, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Christopher M MejiaPublic Health Division, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey D KlausnerDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mark R McGrathPublic Health Division, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
AIDS Healthcare Foundation · USBerkeley Public Health Division · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Advancing HIV Prevention and Linkage to Care Among MSM with GamificationR34MH106359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MCCOY, SANDRA I · 2015 to 2016
$678k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH106359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, young men who have sex with men (YMSM) experience a disproportionate burden of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Mobile health (mHealth) interventions, including those that incorporate elements of games ("gamification"), have the potential to improve YMSM engagement in desirable sexual health services and behaviors. Gamification leverages theory and tools from behavioral science to motivate people to engage in a behavior in a context of fun. The objective of the study was to determine whether an intervention using gamification is acceptable to YMSM in California and potentially increases repeat HIV screening.

methodsEligible YMSM were: (I) 18-26 years, (II) born as and/or self-identified as male, (III) reported male sexual partners, and (IV) lived in a zip code adjacent to one of the two study clinics in Oakland and Hollywood, California. The gamification intervention,

resultsOverall, 166 of 313 (53%) eligible YMSM registered. After registration, 93 (56%) participants completed enrollment and 31 (19%) completed ≥1 online activity in the subsequent 6 months. Points were redeemed in clinic by 11% of the 166 users (27% and 5% of those who enrolled in the clinic and online, respectively). Despite moderate engagement, participants provided a positive assessment of the program in interviews, reporting that the inclusion of game elements was motivating. The analysis of repeat HIV testing was assessed among 31 YMSM who consented to medical record review and who had ≥6 months of follow-up. During follow-up, 15 (48%) received ≥2 HIV tests compared to 157 (30%) of a historical comparison group of 517 similar YMSM who lived in the same zip codes and who received care at the same clinics before the intervention (OR =2.15, 95% CI: 1.03-4.47, P=0.04).

conclusionsEngagement in the intervention was modest, with YMSM who enrolled in a clinic more actively engaged than YMSM who enrolled online. Among the subset of participants recruited in the clinic, repeat HIV screening was higher than a comparison group of similar YMSM attending the same clinic in the prior year.

Indexed as

GamificationHIV screeningincentivesintrinsic motivationmen who have sex with men (MSM)self-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID30363751
PMCPMC6182020
OpenAlexW2893092121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.