Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30363734›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2018

Acupuncture Treatment for Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Soo-Hyun Sung, Angela-Dong-Min Sung, Hyun-Kyung Sung, Tteul-E-Bom An, Kyeong Han Kim, Jang-Kyung Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation and Medical Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Complementary and Alternative (CAM) Treatment Options for Women with Pelvic pain.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Soo-Hyun SungDepartment of Pathology, College of Korean Medicine, Dae-gu Haany University, Daegu 38610, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7655-1090
Angela-Dong-Min SungDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Sangji University, Wonju 26339, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0753-5652
Hyun-Kyung SungDepartment of Korean Pediatrics, College of Korean Medicine, Semyung University, Jechon 27136, Republic of Korea.
Tteul-E-Bom AnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Dae-gu Haany University, Daegu 38610, Republic of Korea.
Kyeong Han KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University, Wanju 55338, Republic of Korea.
Jang-Kyung ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Sangji University, Wonju 26339, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4323-278X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyThis systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture treatment (AT), including electroacupuncture or thread-embedding therapy in combination with modern technology, for chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched 12 electronic databases up to December 2017. All randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of AT for CPP were considered.

resultsFour RCTs with 474 participants were included. The methodological quality of included studies was generally low. The results of meta-analysis of two studies showed that AT combined with conventional treatment (CT) was associated with significantly reduced CPP, based on the total effectiveness rate (n=277, mean difference = 1.29, confidence interval = 1.13 to 1.47, P=0.0001, I

conclusionsThis review suggests the potential of AT combined with CT compared to CT alone for treating female CPP. However, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that AT can be recommended as a complementary and alternative (CAM) treatment for women with CPP. To draw a firm conclusion, future studies should require not only lager, more rigorously designed RCTs but also research on different AT types. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with PROSPERO 2018 (CRD42018088627).

Identifiers

PMID30363734
PMCPMC6180968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.