Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30363722›Full record

ArticlemHealth2018

Physical activity monitors can be successfully implemented to assess perioperative activity in urologic surgery.

Deepak K Agarwal, Boyd R Viers, Marcelino E Rivera, Diedre A Nienow, Igor Frank, Matthew K Tollefson, Matthew T Gettman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06283771 (The Effect of Warmed Socks Developed as Wearable Technology on Hypothermia, Thermal Comfort Perception and Shivering in Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06283771 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Warmed Socks Developed as Wearable Technology on Hypothermia, Thermal Comfort Perception and Shivering in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarsus UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsWearable Technology, Hypothermia, Shivering, Thermal Comfort PerceptionArmsHeated socks to be developed with wearable technology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Digital innovation in medicine: the COVID-19 pandemic as an accelerator of "digital health"].Journal fur Urologie und Urogynakologie : Zeitschrift fur Urologie und Urogynakologie in Klinik und Praxis · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Current use of telehealth in urology: a review.World journal of urology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deepak K AgarwalDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Boyd R ViersDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Marcelino E RiveraDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Diedre A NienowDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Igor FrankDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Matthew K TollefsonDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Matthew T GettmanDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health and physical activity monitors (PAMs) are emerging technologies allowing patients to track multiple health parameters. These parameters could be useful in monitoring and modifying the perioperative health of urology patients. We performed a pilot study and describe a model for which to implement mHealth applications in a urology population.

methodsPatients undergoing robotic assisted retropubic prostatectomy were screened for inclusion and provided with Fitbit® Charge HR

resultsForty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Median duration of PAM usage was one and seven days preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperatively, there was a reduction in median daily steps compared to preoperatively (2,782

conclusionsPAM effectively captures perioperative biophysical parameters and is associated with high patient satisfaction. Clinically, obese and elderly men appear to have significantly reduced activity following prostatectomy.

Indexed as

Fitbitpatient satisfactionperioperative carephysical activity monitor (PAM)postoperative devicesUrologywearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID30363722
PMCPMC6182011
OpenAlexW2894506933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.