ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice
Standardized Assessment of Hereditary Ataxia Patients in Clinical Studies.
Review in Movement disorders clinical practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06324877 (Single Arm Open-label Clinical Trial in Ataxia-telangiectasia to Test the Effects of Nicotinamide Riboside on Ataxia Scales, Immune Function, and Neurofilament Light Chain.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Single Arm Open-label Clinical Trial in Ataxia-telangiectasia to Test the Effects of Nicotinamide Riboside on Ataxia Scales, Immune Function, and Neurofilament Light Chain.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognition in cerebellar disorders: What's in the profile? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Quantitative Oculomotor Assessment in Hereditary Ataxia: Systematic Review and Consensus by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital-motor Biomarkers.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of a Home-Base Core Stability Exercises in Hereditary Ataxia. A Randomized Controlled Trial. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Trial
- Early and Progressive Spinal Cord Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: a live e-version.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Hereditary Ataxias in Argentina.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Review
- Quantitative Gait and Balance Outcomes for Ataxia Trials: Consensus Recommendations by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital-Motor Biomarkers.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Review
- Consensus Recommendations for Clinical Outcome Assessments and Registry Development in Ataxias: Ataxia Global Initiative (AGI) Working Group Expert Guidance.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Review
- Cognitive Decline Is Closely Associated with Ataxia Severity in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: a Validation Study of the Schmahmann Syndrome Scale.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022Article
- Placebo response in degenerative cerebellar ataxias: a descriptive review of randomized, placebo-controlled trials.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Corticospinal tract involvement in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: a diffusion tensor imaging study.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Hand Dexterity and Pyramidal Dysfunction in Friedreich Ataxia, A Finger Tapping Study.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2021Article
- 15-White Dots APP-Coo-Test: a reliable touch-screen application for assessing upper limb movement impairment in patients with cerebellar ataxias.Journal of neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 17 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHereditary ataxias are a heterogeneous group of degenerative diseases of the cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord. They may present with isolated ataxia or with additional symptoms going beyond cerebellar deficits. There are an increasing number of clinical studies with the goal to define the natural history of these disorders, develop biomarkers, and investigate therapeutic interventions. Especially, early and preclinical disease stages are currently of particular interest. METHODS AND
resultsEvidence-based, we review standards for sampling and storage of biomaterials, clinical and neuropsychological assessment, as well as neurophysiology and neuroimaging and recommendations for standardized assessment of ataxia patients in multicenter studies.
conclusionsDNA, RNA, serum, and, if possible, cerebrospinal fluid samples should be processed following established standards. Clinical assessment in ataxia studies must include use of a validated clinical ataxia scale. There are several validated clinical ataxia scales available. There are no instruments that were specifically designed for assessing neuropsychological and psychiatric symptoms in ataxia disorders. We provide a list of tests that may prove valuable. Quantitative performance tests have the potential to supplement clinical scales. They provide additional objective and quantitative information. Posturography and quantitative movement analysis-despite valid approaches-require standardization before implemented in multicenter studies. Standardization of neurophysiological tools, as required for multicenter interventional trials, is still lacking. Future multicenter neuroimaging studies in ataxias should implement quality assurance measures as defined by the ADNI or other consortia. MRI protocols should allow morphometric analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.