Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30363472›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice

Parkinson's Disease Biomarkers: Where Are We and Where Do We Go Next?

Lana M Chahine, Matthew B Stern

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders clinical practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex differences in movement disorders.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Biomarkers of Parkinson's disease: 20 years later.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lana M ChahineDepartment of Neurology Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Matthew B SternDepartment of Neurology Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.

Funding

Project IV: "Alpha-Synuclein Strains & Diverse Synucleinopathies"P50NS053488 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TROJANOWSKI, JOHN Q. · 2007 to 2017
$20.9M
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS053488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObjective measures of Parkinson's disease (PD) are needed for purposes of diagnosis and prognostication, as well as identification of those at risk of PD. In this qualitative review, we provide an overview of the current state of the field of PD biomarker development, delineate challenges, and discuss how the field is evolving.

methodsA search of PubMed was conducted for articles pertaining to objective biomarkers for PD. Articles were selected based on relevance and methodology; where available, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and comprehensive qualitative review articles were preferentially referenced.

resultsThere are several potential sources of objective PD biomarkers including biofluids, peripheral tissue, imaging, genetics, and technology based objective motor testing. Approaches to biomarker identification include the candidate biomarker approach and unbiased discovery methods, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. Several emerging techniques hold promise in each of these areas. Advances in technology and bioinformatics, and the increasing availability of biobanks, are expected to facilitate future PD biomarker development.

conclusionsThe field of objective biomarkers for PD has made great progress but much remains to be done in translating putative biomarkers into tools useful in the clinic and for research. Multimodal biomarker platforms have the potential to capitalize on the utility and strengths of individual biomarkers. Rigorous methodology and standards for replication of findings will be key to meaningful progress in the field.

Indexed as

biomarkersParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID30363472
PMCPMC6174521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.