ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice
The Symptomatic Treatment of Acquired Dystonia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Movement disorders clinical practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical spectrum and management of dystonia in patients with Japanese encephalitis: A systematic review.Brain and behavior · 2022Pooled it
- Deep Brain Stimulation and Thalamotomy for the Treatment of Dystonia Acquired by Moyamoya Disease with Stroke.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Medical treatment of dystonia.Journal of clinical movement disorders · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcquired dystonia is caused by an acquired or exogenous event. Although the therapeutic armamentarium used in clinical practice is more or less similar to that used for inherited or idiopathic dystonia, formal proof of the efficacy of these interventions in acquired dystonia is lacking.
methodsThe authors attempt to provide a comprehensive and systematic review of the current evidence for medical and allied health care treatment strategies in acquired dystonias. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PiCarta, and PsycINFO databases were searched up to December 2015, including randomized controlled trials, patient-control studies, and case series or single case reports containing a report on clinical outcome.
resultsThere are level 3 practice recommendations for botulinum toxin injections and globus pallidus pars interna deep brain stimulation for tardive dystonia and dystonic cerebral palsy as well as intrathecal baclofen for dystonic cerebral palsy. There are insufficient and conflicting data on the effect (vs. the hazard) of other pharmacological interventions, and limited work has been done on other forms of neurostimulation and allied health care. Because no class A1 or A2 studies were identified, level 1 or 2 practice recommendations could not be deducted for a specific treatment intervention.
conclusionsTo improve the current medical and allied health care treatment options for patients with acquired dystonia, high-quality trials that examine the efficacy of therapies need to be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.