Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30363396›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Parkinson's Disease Mild Cognitive Impairment Battery Using the Movement Disorder Society Task Force Criteria.

Ondrej Bezdicek, Tomas Nikolai, Jiri Michalec, Filip Růžička, Petra Havránková, Jan Roth, Robert Jech, Evžen Růžička

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ondrej BezdicekCharles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience Prague Czech Republic.
Tomas NikolaiCharles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience Prague Czech Republic.
Jiri MichalecCharles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Department of Psychiatry Prague Czech Republic.
Filip RůžičkaCharles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience Prague Czech Republic.
Petra HavránkováCharles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience Prague Czech Republic.
Jan RothCharles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience Prague Czech Republic.
Robert JechCharles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience Prague Czech Republic.
Evžen RůžičkaCharles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience Prague Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to provide empirical evidence regarding the classification accuracy of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) neuropsychological battery (NB) in the determination of Parkinson's disease mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI).

methodsThe present cross-sectional study included 106 PD patients subjected to PD-MCI classification at Level I and 120 healthy controls (HCs). All HC and PD subjects were then assessed with MDS-NB at Level II and matched according to age and education using different thresholds (1.5 and 2.0 standard deviations [SDs] below average).

resultsWe found that Level I and II resulted in different classifications of PD-MCI status. Detection thresholds of -1.5 SD and -2.0 SDs at Level II had also a significant impact on the discriminative validity of all measures in the MDS neuropsychological battery, based on area under the curve analyses. Overall, semantic fluency showed the highest potential in all comparisons not only between PD-MCI and HC, but also between PD-MCI and PD with no deficit (PD-ND).

conclusionsOur results show that the battery at Level II is applicable and that some measures, such as semantic fluency, have high discriminative validity in the detection of PD-MCI versus PD-ND and HCs.

Indexed as

mild cognitive impairmentParkinson's diseasevalidity

Identifiers

PMID30363396
PMCPMC6174468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.