Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30363155›Full record

ArticleBJR case reports2018

Off-label magnetic resonance imaging of an InterStim II sacral nerve stimulator device.

Andrew Fry, Nikhil Kotnis, Russel Edward, Peter J Wright

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BJR case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew FryDepartment of Medical Imaging and Medical Physics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Nikhil KotnisDepartment of Medical Imaging and Medical Physics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Russel EdwardDepartment of Medical Imaging and Medical Physics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Peter J WrightDepartment of Medical Imaging and Medical Physics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The InterStim II (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) sacral nerve stimulator has been approved for MRI scanning of the head only. All other body areas are contraindicated by the manufacturer. This report presents the successful MRI examination of the left hand in a patient with an InterStim II device. Following an assessment of the risks and benefits of proceeding with the scan it was shown that there were minimal additional risks, which could be easily managed with appropriate patient positioning, coil selection and other established techniques. Informed consent was obtained and the scan completed without incident. Following the scan the patient reported full functioning of the device. MRI of the hand is feasible in patients with InterStim II implants using transmit/receive coils with appropriate risk controls in place. Further study of the safety of MRI of other body regions in InterStim II patients is appropriate.

Identifiers

PMID30363155
PMCPMC6159144
OpenAlexW2740707928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.