Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30362918›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018

Predicting Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Using Administrative Claims.

Jennifer S Albrecht, Maya Hanna, Dure Kim, Eleanor M Perfetto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping morbidity 10 years prior to a diagnosis of young onset Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using real-world electronic health records.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Decomposing Urban and Rural Disparities of Preventable ED Visits Among Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Evidence of the Availability of Health Care Resources.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer S Albrecht1 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Maya Hanna2 University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore.
Dure Kim2 University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore.
Eleanor M Perfetto3 University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore; National Health Council, Washington, DC; and OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Funding

Prioritizing Quality Improvement for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disturbances Following Traumatic Brain InjuryK01HS024560 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ALBRECHT, JENNIFER S. · 2016 to 2020
$735k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS024560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredictive models for earlier diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) that rely on variables requiring assessment during an office visit, such as cognitive function, body mass index, or lifestyle factors, may not be broadly applicable, since that level of data may be inaccessible or inefficient.

objectiveTo build a predictive model for earlier diagnosis of ADRD using only administrative claims data to enhance applicability at the health care-system level. Building on the strength of this approach and knowledge that health care utilization (HCU) is increased before dementia diagnosis, it was hypothesized that previous HCU history would improve predictive ability of the model.

methodsWe conducted a case-control study using data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. ADRD was defined using ICD-9-CM codes and prescription fills for antidementia medications. We included individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Cases aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis between 2011-2014 were matched to controls without ADRD. HCU variables were incorporated into regression models along with comorbidities and symptoms.

resultsThe derivation cohort comprised 24,521 cases and 95,464 controls. Final adjusted models were stratified by age. We obtained moderate accuracy (c-statistic = 0.76) for the model among younger (aged < 65 years) adults and poor discriminatory ability (c-statistic = 0.63) for the model among older adults (aged ≥ 65 years). Neurological and psychological disorders had the largest effect estimates.

conclusionsWe created age-stratified predictive models for earlier diagnosis of dementia using information available in administrative claims. These models could be used in decision support systems to promote targeted cognitive screening and earlier dementia recognition for individuals aged < 65 years. These models should be validated in other cohorts. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by AstraZeneca, Global CEO Initiative, Janssen, OptumLabs, and Roche. Albrecht was supported by Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research grant K01HS024560. Perfetto is employed by the National Health Council, which accepts membership dues and sponsorships from a variety of organizations and companies. The authors declare no other potential conflicts of interest.

Indexed as

Administrative Claims, HealthcareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlzheimer DiseaseCase-Control StudiesCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNootropic AgentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareNootropic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30362918
PMCPMC10397649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.