Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30362917›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2018

Health Care Costs of Anal Cancer in a Commercially Insured Population in the United States.

Chi-Fang Wu, Li Xu, Shuangshuang Fu, Ho-Lan Peng, Craig A Messick, David R Lairson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chi-Fang Wu1 Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Li Xu2 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery.
Shuangshuang Fu4 Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health.
Ho-Lan Peng5 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Craig A Messick3 Department of Surgical Oncology, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
David R Lairson1 Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Health and Human Development (2HD) Research Network · CMThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence and death rate of anal cancer in the United States has been increasing on average 2%-3% per year over the past 10 years. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is a potentially viable prevention strategy, since about 80% of anal cancers are attributable to HPV. To understand the effect of HPV vaccination, it is important to estimate the treatment costs for the HPV-related disease.

objectiveTo estimate the 2-year per patient mean direct health care costs associated with anal cancer in a commercially insured population in the United States.

methodsAll newly diagnosed anal cancer patients were identified from a 2011-2014 Truven MarketScan database. Matched population controls were selected from the database with a 2-step matching method using demographic, comorbidity, and health care cost variables. Costs for the first 2 years were measured for cancer patients and controls. The difference in costs between the groups was calculated to estimate the costs associated with anal cancer treatment. A generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link function was applied to estimate the costs for censored months for the patients who did not have at least 2 years of follow-up.

results1,976 patients with anal cancer and 1,976 controls were included in the study. The first 2-year per patient adjusted mean cost associated with anal cancer treatment was $127,531 (SD = $189,064). Male sex, cancer diagnosis, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and higher prediagnosis costs were significantly associated with higher monthly costs. Higher psychiatric diagnostic group scores were associated with lower monthly costs. Anal cancer treatment costs were highest in the first 6 months after diagnosis (per patient per month [PPPM] mean = $12,846), leveling off at a much lower monthly cost during the subsequent 18 months of the 2-year period (PPPM mean = $3,717).

conclusionsThe first 2-year costs associated with anal cancer treatment were substantial. Given that approximately 80% of anal cancers are attributable to HPV infection, this study provides important parameters for estimating the potential economic benefit of HPV vaccination. DISCLOSURES: This research was accomplished within the Oropharynx Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and was funded in part through the Stiefel Oropharyngeal Research Fund. The authors report funding contributions from the Christopher and Susan Damico Chair in Viral Associated Malignancies (The University of Texas MD Anderson). This work was supported by generous philanthropic contributions, including a contribution from the Lyda Hill Foundation, to The University of Texas MD Anderson HPV-Related Cancers Moon Shot Program. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCommerceComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansIncidenceInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus VaccinesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30362917
PMCPMC10397580
OpenAlexW2898529257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.