Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30362670›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2019

Ovarian cancer: Pathogenesis and current recommendations for prophylactic surgery

I Nyoman Gede Budiana, Michelle Angelina, Tjokorda Gede Astawa Pemayun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. PLGA-PEG-c(RGDfK)-IET nanobiotechnology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent Insight about HE4 Role in Ovarian Cancer Oncogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I Nyoman Gede BudianaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Udayana University Sanglah General Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Bali, IndonesiaORCID 0000-0002-2910-1054
Michelle AngelinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Udayana University Sanglah General Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Bali, IndonesiaORCID 0000-0002-6910-4794
Tjokorda Gede Astawa PemayunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Udayana University Sanglah General Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Bali, IndonesiaORCID 0000-0002-9936-9128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers, and one of the leading causes of cancer-associated female mortality in the world. Currently, no widely accepted pathogenesis is available, which may explain the entire disease. Early detection and primary prevention of ovarian cancer are difficult, mostly due to its heterogeneous nature. Risk factor modification based on epidemiologic data has not significantly reduced the incidence of ovarian cancer. Currently, prophylactic surgical methods have been proposed as the most effective preventive measures for both the high-risk or low-risk populations. Understanding the existing pathogenesis theories and the surgical options available may alter physician’s perspectives and facilitate better decision making.

Indexed as

Ovarian cancerprimary preventionsalpingectomysalpingo-oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID30362670
PMCPMC6501866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.