ReviewJournal of cellular physiology2019
Real-time detection of breast cancer at the cellular level.
Review in Journal of cellular physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multispectral Imaging of Metabolic Fluorophores: Comparing In Vivo and Fresh Ex Vivo Tissue.Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression · 2024Article
- Article
- Intraoperative microscopic autofluorescence detection and characterization in brain tumors using stimulated Raman histology and two-photon fluorescence.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Biomedical Applications of Translational Optical Imaging: From Molecules to Humans.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Novel optoelectronic instrumentation has been developed for the multispectral imaging of autofluorescence emitted by metabolic fluorophores. The images resolve individual cells while spectra are collected for each pixel in the images. These datacubes are generated at a rate of 10 per second-fast enough for surgical guidance. The data is processed in real time to provide a single color-coded image to the surgeon. To date, the system has been applied to fresh, ex vivo, human surgical specimens and has distinguished breast cancer from benign tissue. The approach is applicable to in vivo measurements of surgical margins and needle-based optical biopsies. Ongoing work demonstrates that the system has great potential for translation to a hand-held probe with high sensitivity and specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.