Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30362249›Full record

ArticleLiver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society2019

Differences in Posttransplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence by Etiology of Liver Disease.

Nadim Mahmud, Abraham Shaked, Kim M Olthoff, David S Goldberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Risk Factors and Center-Level Variation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Under-Staging for Liver Transplantation.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadim MahmudDivisions of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-1889-3954
Abraham ShakedTransplant Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Kim M OlthoffTransplant Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
David S GoldbergDivisions of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING IN GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007740 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI James D Lewis · 1997 to 2026
$9.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 5-year incidence of posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence is 8%-20%. Several studies have evaluated pretransplant risk factors for HCC recurrence, but nearly all data have treated HCC as a homogeneous condition across all etiologies of liver disease despite differences in tumor biology and baseline incidence of HCC. We sought to evaluate the impact of etiology of liver disease, maximum pretransplant alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and the interaction of the 2 factors on the risk of HCC recurrence. We performed a retrospective cohort study of HCC transplant recipients using United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from 2002 to 2016. A competing risks regression was performed to identify variables associated with HCC recurrence and an interaction term between etiology and maximum AFP category. Among 18,406 recipients, 1484 patients experienced HCC recurrence over 3.1 years of median follow-up time. There was a significant interaction between AFP category and etiology of liver disease (P < 0.001). Among patients with a maximum AFP <100 ng/mL, those with alcoholic liver disease had the lowest risk of recurrence. In contrast, in patients with a maximum AFP of 100-499, 500-1000, or >1000 ng/mL, those with alcoholic liver disease had the highest risk of HCC recurrence among all etiologies. In conclusion, risk of HCC recurrence differs by etiology of liver disease, and the significance of elevated pretransplant AFP varies by etiology. Patients with alcoholic liver disease and elevated maximum AFP are at a uniquely high risk of HCC recurrence. These findings have potential UNOS policy implications because the transplant selection process may ultimately benefit from etiology-specific criteria.

Indexed as

alpha-FetoproteinsCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver Diseases, AlcoholicLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient SelectionPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesAFP protein, humanalpha-Fetoproteins

Identifiers

PMID30362249
PMCPMC6395513
OpenAlexW2898290336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.