Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30362079›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2018

Improving Treatment for Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients.

Julia Montoro, Aslihan Yerlikaya, Abdullah Ali, Azra Raza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia MontoroDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, Milstein Hospital Building, 6N-435, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Aslihan YerlikayaDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, Milstein Hospital Building, 6N-435, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Abdullah AliDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, Milstein Hospital Building, 6N-435, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Azra RazaDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, Milstein Hospital Building, 6N-435, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA. ar3017@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementAging is the most potent of carcinogens, especially for the bone marrow stem cell clonal disorders called myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Age-associated changes in the microenvironment or the soil of the bone marrow (BM) as well as in the cell or the seed provide a growth advantage for clonal myeloid cells. Slowly accumulating senescent cells which can no longer divide because they have reached the end of their proliferative life cycle, but which continue to produce metabolic debris, overwhelm the natural autophagy mechanisms resulting in pro-inflammatory changes in the BM soil. In addition, the seed or stem cells acquire passenger mutations with each round of proliferation resulting from DNA copying errors. Some mutations commonly associated with MDS can be found in older, otherwise healthy individuals; however, when combined with other passenger mutations or in the setting of a noxious soil, the result could be a proliferative advantage for one stem cell over others, leading to its clonal expansion and development of the clinical syndrome. When considering therapeutic options for MDS patients, the important considerations are related to both the common co-morbidities of an elderly population along with the heterogeneous passenger mutations and the inflammatory changes in the soil. At present, allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option in MDS. Palliative strategies are directed at improving the quality of life and prolonging survival. Only three drugs are FDA approved, two being the hypomethylating agents azacytidine and decitabine while the third is lenalidomide which is restricted to lower risk MDS patients with deletion 5q. Promising future therapies are directed at reversing the pro-inflammatory changes in the microenvironment (luspatercept) or targeting specific mutations isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1, IDH2, p53, EZH2. More durable responses are to be expected when the seed and soil are targeted simultaneously through a combination of drugs.

Indexed as

AgingAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAzacitidineDecitabineEnzyme InhibitorsHumansLenalidomideMyelodysplastic SyndromesStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, HomologousAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAzacitidineDecitabineEnzyme InhibitorsLenalidomideAnemiaBone marrowCytopeniaMyelodysplasiaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30362079
OpenAlexW2898100044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.