Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30362056›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Katherine L Palmerola, Sally F Vitez, Selma Amrane, Catha P Fischer, Eric J Forman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05548101 (Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing ICSI to Insemination for Non-Male Factor Patients Undergoing PGT-A), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05548101 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing ICSI to Insemination for Non-Male Factor Patients Undergoing PGT-A

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Fertility CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled500ConditionsInfertilityArmsICSI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Conventional IVF is feasible in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Addressing ethical issues related to prenatal diagnostic procedures.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: The management of mosaic embryos.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine L PalmerolaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Columbia University Medical Center, 5 Columbus Circle, PH, New York, NY, 10019, USA. Kdl2112@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6788-1453
Sally F VitezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 622 West 168th Street, PH 16-66, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Selma AmraneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Columbia University Medical Center, 5 Columbus Circle, PH, New York, NY, 10019, USA.
Catha P FischerIVI/RMA New Jersey, 140 Allen Road, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA.
Eric J FormanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Columbia University Medical Center, 5 Columbus Circle, PH, New York, NY, 10019, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · USReproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdvances in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) have led to practice changes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), enabling fertility centers to transfer single embryos while maintaining excellent ongoing pregnancy rates, reducing miscarriage rates, and dramatically reducing ART-associated multiple pregnancies. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows PGT laboratories to assess for embryo mosaicism-although the true incidence and reproductive potential of predicted mosaic embryos are controversial. Due to concern for genetic contamination from other spermatozoa, most reference laboratories require use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for single gene preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGT-M). However, in PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A), conventional insemination (IVF) is typically permissible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of euploid, aneuploid, and mosaic in trophectoderm biopsy samples from embryos in IVF versus ICSI PGT-A cycles. Secondary aims were to assess sex ratio, and subtypes of aneuploidy and mosaicism in IVF versus ICSI PGT-A cycles.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of women undergoing PGT-A at a single academic fertility center from July 1, 2015, to September 1, 2017. In all cycles, PGT-A was performed via trophectoderm biopsy on day 5 or 6 and analyzed using NGS at a single reference lab. We collected and compared patient demographics, fertility testing, cycle characteristics, and PGT-A outcomes between IVF and ICSI cycles.

resultsThree hundred two PGT-A cycles were included for analysis: 75 IVF and 227 ICSI cycles, resulting in 251 IVF and 724 ICSI biopsied blastocysts. Mean oocyte age of included cycles was 38.6 years (IVF) and 38.5 years (ICSI), p = 0.85. Baseline characteristics of IVF and ICSI PGT-A cycles were similar with the exception of semen parameters: IVF cycles had higher sperm concentration and total motility compared to ICSI cycles. PGT-A outcomes did not differ between IVF and ICSI cycles: euploid 27.9% (IVF) versus 30% (ICSI); aneuploid 45.4% (IVF) versus 43.1% (ICSI); no result 4.4% (IVF) versus 6.2% (ICSI). Though not significant, we identified a trend toward higher rate of mosaicism in IVF (25.9%) versus ICSI (20.9%). Among mosaic embryos, a lower percentage of simple mosaic embryos resulted from IVF (53.8%) versus ICSI (70.2%). Among aneuploid embryos, a non-significant higher percentage of complex aneuploidy resulted from IVF (16.3%) versus ICSI (9%). IVF resulted in a non-significant higher proportion of cycles with no transferrable embryos (42.7%) versus ICSI (36.6%). Numerical and sex chromosome involvement in mosaicism and aneuploidy were similar between IVF and ICSI cycles.

conclusionIVF and ICSI NGS PGT-A have similar rates of euploid, aneuploid, and no result embryos, though IVF may result in higher rates of mosaicism and demonstrates differences in proportions of mosaic and aneuploid subtypes compared to ICSI. ICSI may be preferable to conventional insemination to minimize the rate of mosaic results in NGS PGT-A cycles.

Indexed as

AneuploidyFertilization in VitroPregnancy RateAbortion, SpontaneousAdultEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilityGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLive BirthMaleMosaicismPregnancyPreimplantation DiagnosisConventional inseminationIntracytoplasmic sperm injectionMosaicismNext-generation sequencingPreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID30362056
PMCPMC6338605
OpenAlexW2898202731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.