Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30361949›Full record

ReviewArchives of pharmacal research2018

Pharmacology of natural radioprotectors.

Gil-Im Mun, Seoyoung Kim, Eun Choi, Cha Soon Kim, Yun-Sil Lee

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of pharmacal research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Radioprotective Potency of Nanoceria.Current radiopharmaceuticals · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gil-Im MunGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 120-750, Korea.
Seoyoung KimGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 120-750, Korea.
Eun ChoiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 120-750, Korea.
Cha Soon KimRadiation Health Institute, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power CO., LTD, 172, Dolmr-ro, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13605, Korea. chasoon.kim@khnp.co.kr.
Yun-Sil LeeGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 120-750, Korea. yslee0425@ewha.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2017M2A2A702019560National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2017R1A2B2002327National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2018R1A5A2025286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy is one of the most efficient ways to treat cancer. However, deleterious effects, such as acute and chronic toxicities that reduce the quality of life, may result. Naturally occurring compounds have been shown to be non-toxic over wide dose ranges and are inexpensive and effective. Additionally, pharmacological strategies have been developed that use radioprotectors to inhibit radiation-induced toxicities. Currently available radioprotectors have several limitations, including toxicity. In this review, we present the mechanisms of proven radioprotectors, ranging from free radical scavenging (the best-known mechanism of radioprotection) to molecular-based radioprotection (e.g., upregulating expression of heat shock proteins). Finally, we discuss naturally occurring compounds with radioprotective properties in the context of these mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBiological ProductsDNA RepairFree RadicalsHumansNeoplasmsQuality of LifeRadiation InjuriesRadiation-Protective AgentsRadiotherapyBiological ProductsFree RadicalsRadiation-Protective AgentsMechanismsNatural compoundsRadioprotectorsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID30361949
PMCPMC6224001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.