ArticleJournal of digital imaging2019
Content-Based Image Retrieval System for Pulmonary Nodules Using Optimal Feature Sets and Class Membership-Based Retrieval.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multi-level similarity measure for the retrieval of the common CT imaging signs of lung diseases.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer manifests itself in the form of lung nodules, the diagnosis of which is essential to plan the treatment. Automated retrieval of nodule cases will assist the budding radiologists in self-learning and differential diagnosis. This paper presents a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system for lung nodules using optimal feature sets and learning to enhance the performance of retrieval. The classifiers with more features suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Like classification schemes, we found that the optimal feature set selected using the minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance (mRMR) feature selection technique improves the precision performance of simple distance-based retrieval (SDR). The performance of the classifier is always superior to SDR, which leans researchers towards conventional classifier-based retrieval (CCBR). While CCBR improves the average precision and provides 100% precision for correct classification, it fails for misclassification leading to zero retrieval precision. The class membership-based retrieval (CMR) is found to bridge this gap for texture-based retrieval. Here, CMR is proposed for nodule retrieval using shape-, margin-, and texture-based features. It is found again that optimal feature set is important for the classifier used in CMR as well as for the feature set used for retrieval, which may lead to different feature sets. The proposed system is evaluated using two independent databases from two continents: a public database LIDC/IDRI and a private database PGIMER-IITKGP, using three distance metrics, i.e., Canberra, City block, and Euclidean. The proposed CMR-based retrieval system with optimal feature sets performs better than CCBR and SDR with optimal features in terms of average precision. Apart from average precision and standard deviation of precision, the fraction of queries with zero precision retrieval is also measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.