ArticleFolia microbiologica2019
Prevalence of human pathogens of the clade Nakaseomyces in a culture collection-the first report on Candida bracarensis in Poland.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A dual-phase strategy to integrate the VITEK MS RUO database into routine clinical practice: from validation of analytical performance to implementation of an automated workflow.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- An update on clinically relevant, rare, and emergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Chromosome level assemblies of Nakaseomyces (Candida) bracarensis uncover two distinct clades and define its adhesin repertoire.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Factors Associated with Candidiasis in Pemphigus Vulgaris Patients: Results from a Retrospective Study in Two Second-Care Level Hospitals in Mexico.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Overview on the Infections Related to RarePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Detection and Molecular Identification of EightMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Review
- Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model System To Assess Candida glabrata,Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
- Usefulness of a multiplex PCR for the rapid identification of Candida glabrata species complex in Mexican clinical isolates.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2019Article
- Lack of detection of Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis among 440 clinical Candida glabrata sensu lato isolates in Kuwait.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human pathogens belonging to the Nakaseomyces clade include Candida glabrata sensu stricto, Candida nivariensis and Candida bracarensis. Their highly similar phenotypic characteristics often lead to misidentification by conventional laboratory methods. Therefore, limited information on the true epidemiology of the Candida glabrata species complex is available. Due to life-threatening infections caused by these species, it is crucial to supplement this knowledge. The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of C. bracarensis and C. nivariensis in a culture collection of C. glabrata complex isolates. The study covered 353 isolates identified by biochemical methods as C. glabrata, collected from paediatric and adult patients hospitalised at four medical centres in Southern Poland. The multiplex PCR was used to identify the strains. Further species confirmation was performed via sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis. One isolate was recognised as C. bracarensis (0.28%). To our knowledge, it is the first isolate in Poland. C. glabrata sensu stricto species has been confirmed for all the remaining isolates. No C. nivariensis was found. Our study has shown that the prevalence of C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis strains is infrequent. However, it should be emphasised that the incidence of these strains may differ locally and depend on environmental factors and the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.